iRubric: Leadership & Professionalism in Event Execution rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Leadership & Professionalism in Event Execution

Angels in Horse Hairs

This rubric defines the leadership and professionalism of undergraduate students working in teams to plan an event.

Rubric Code: T77572

By SuzanBunn

Draft

Private Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Daily Performance
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts	(N/A)
Attendance/Participation
Attendance	Poor Student did not attend the event. Student did not attend the majority of the team meetings for the event.	Fair Student missed 60% of the team meetings for the event.	Good Student attended 80% of the meetings for the event.	Excellent Student attended the event and all team meetings, and was on time.	N/A
Participation	Poor Student did not participate in activities. Did not listen to others or pay attention to team leaders.	Fair Student participated in activities 60% (or slightly less) of the time with some prompting. Rarely listened to others or paid attention to team leaders.	Good Student participated in activities in discussions in 80% of the time with minimal prompting. Usually listened to others and pays attention to team leaders.	Excellent Student always participated in activities and discussions without prompting. Listened to others and paid attention to team leaders.	N/A
Participation Dynamics
Attitude	Poor Less than 60% of the time, student consistently demonstrated a negative and disrespectful attitude toward peers, team leaders and group tasks.	Fair 60% of the time, student struggled to demonstrate a positve and respectful attitude towards peers, team leaders and a negative attitude about group tasks.	Good 80% of the time, student emonstrated a positive and respectful attitude towards peers, team leaders and group tasks.	Excellent Student always demonstrated a positive and respectful attitude toward peers, team leaders and group tasks.	N/A
Working with Others	Poor Less than 60% of the time, student listened to, shared with, or supported others. Student was often disruptive to peers in the group.	Fair 60% of the time, student listened to, shared with, and supported others. Student was sometimes disruptive to peers in the group.	Good 80% of the time, student listened to, shared with, and supported others. Student was rarely disruptive to peers in the group.	Excellent Student always listened to, shared with, and supported others. Student was never disruptive to peers in the group.	N/A
Focus	Poor Less than 60% of the time, student focused on the group discussion or task. Required constant redirection to stay on task.	Fair 60% of the time, student focused on the group discussion or task. Required frequent redirection to stay on task.	Good 80% of the time, student maintained focus on the group discussion or task. Required occasional redirection to stay on task.	Excellent Student always stayed focused on the group discussion and task. Required minimal redirection to stay on task.	N/A
Effort	Poor Less than 60% of the time, work reflected no effort from this student.	Fair 60% of the time, work reflected effort from this student.	Good 80% of the time, work reflected effort from this student.	Excellent Student's work always reflected a strong effort from this student.	N/A
Leadership/Professionalism
Group Rules	Poor Less than 60% of the time, student disobeyed group rules, regardless of prompting/redirection.	Fair 60% of the time, student required prompting/redirectionto follow group rules.	Good 80% of the time, student required prompting/redirectionto follow group rules.	Excellent Student always followed group rules.	N/A
Independent & Collaborative Work	Poor Less than 60% of the time, student did not complete tasks; overly relied on others, and asked repetitive questions.	Fair 60% of the time, student depended on others for occassional assistance; Asked clarification questions.	Good 80% of the time, student followed directions, used time productively and completed work in a timely manner. Shares ideas. Accepts the ideas of others.	Excellent Student always takes initiative and is self motivated; Completed tasks without prompting; and is highly cooperative with group members.	N/A
Respect & Responsibility	Poor Less than 60% of the time, student showed appropriate behavior by respecting others and being responsible with property and in activities.	Fair 60% of the time, student showed appropriate behavior by respecting others and being responsible with property and in activities.	Good 80% of the time, student showed appropriate behavior by respecting others and being responsible with property and in activities	Excellent Student is always a positive role model. Exemplary respect and responsibility actions.	N/A
Professionalism	Poor Less that 60% of the time, student was approachable, dedicated, flexible and patient in the event planning and orchestrration process. Did not honor "dress code".	Fair 60% of the time student was approachable, dedicated, flexible and patient in the event planning and orchestrration process. maintained "dress code".	Good 80% of the time student was approachable, dedicated, flexible and patient in the event planning and orchestrration process. maintained "dress code".	Excellent Student always maintained "dress code" and professional appearance during event planning and orchestration, by being approachable, dedicated, flexible, and patient.	N/A
Ethics	Poor Less than 60% of the time, student took responsibility for obligations, actions and decisions. Did not exhibit fairness and transparency.	Fair 60% of the time takes responsibility for obligations, actions and decisions. Exhibits some fairness and transparency.	Good 80% of the time takes responsibility for obligations, actions and decisions. Consistently exhibits fairness and transparency.	Excellent Student takes total responsibility for obligations, actions and decisions. Always exhibits fairness and transparency.	N/A
Time Management Skills	Poor Less than 60%, student prioritized goals, set SMART objectives, created action plans and demonstrated project management skills.	Fair 60% of the time prioritized goals, set SMART objectives, created action plans and demonstrated project management skills.	Good 80% of the time prioritized goals, set SMART objectives, created action plans and demonstrated project management skills.	Excellent Always prioritized goals, set SMART objectives, created action plans and demonstrated project management skills.	N/A

Keywords:

Leadership, Professionalism, Event Planning

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric