iRubric: Chinese Movie/Literature Analysis Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Chinese Movie/Literature Analysis Presentation

This rubric is to evaluate AP Chinese students' literacy analysis abilities after watching the movie, "The Joy Luck Club" 喜福会

Rubric Code: T2W4BAX

By liyunlu

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Foreign Languages

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12

Movie Analysis Presentation
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Organization	Excellent •Students present a sophisticated, logical, and interesting organizational sequence which audience can easily follow.	Good •Students develop logical sequence which audience can follow.	Fair •Pattern is vague and ill-conceived; lacks clear structure, making it hard for the audience to follow	Poor •Student does not address pattern or the pattern is illogical
Delivery	Excellent •Students maintain eye contact with audience and clear, correct, precise pronunciation of terms is used so that all audience members can hear presentation. •Student is very enthusiastic and fluid. Presentation demonstrates mastery of grammar, usage, mechanics and spelling.	Good •Students maintain eye contact most of the time and voice are clear. •Student pronounces most words correctly. •Most audience members can hear presentation. Student creates a fluid presentation. •Presentation demonstrates control of grammar, usage, mechanics and spelling.	Fair •Students occasionally use eye contact and voices are low. •Students incorrectly pronounce or seem unfamiliar with terms. •Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation. •Students are somewhat fluid in presentation. •Presentation contains some intrusive errors in grammar, usage, mechanics and spelling.	Poor •Students present information with no eye contact. •Students mumble, incorrectly pronounces or use terms, and speak too quietly for students in the back of class to hear. •Body language is too distracting. •Presentation contains frequent, severe errors in grammar, usage, mechanics and spelling.
Analysis of three Tasks x2	Excellent • Analysis offers insightful discussion of tasks. Go well beyond observation, and includes an analytical perspective.	Good • Analysis offers accurate interpretation of the tasks and go beyond observation, to include analytical perspective.	Fair • Analysis conveys a partly accurate understanding of the tasks and offer few or superficial interpretations and/or explanations of tasks. May have a tendency to simply retell.	Poor • Analysis convey a confused or largely inaccurate understanding of the tasks; explanations and Interpretations are often unclear.
Use of Evidence	Excellent •Students use movie plot evidence to support well-developed claims/ideas. •Evidence is substantial and has direct correlation to claim. •All evidence is correctly cited and all shown on their PPT (screen shots or/and movie clips)	Good •Students use movie plot evidence to support ideas/claims. •Correlation may be difficult to follow at times, but attempt to create link is evident. •Most evidence is correctly cited and mostly shown on their PPT (screen shots or/and movie clips)	Fair •Students give broad ideas with some movie plot evidence; some evidence may be misused. • Examples from the work of movie /literature are quoted without a clear connection to the focus of the analysis. •Some evidence is correctly cited and shown on their PPT (screen shots or/and movie clips)	Poor •Students give broad ideas with no textual evidence or evidence doesn't correlate with ideas. •Examples from the work of movie/literature are not cited. •No evidence is correctly cited and none shown on their PPT (screen shots or/and movie clips)
Time Usage	Excellent Presentation meets the 10 minute time requirement.	Good N/A	Fair N/A	Poor Presentation is over 11 minutes long or under 9 minutes long.

Keywords:

Presentation

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric