Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Metric System vs Imperial System Presentation #1 rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Metric System vs Imperial System Presentation #1
Metric System vs Imperial System Presentation #1
Choose your system and be able to justify your choice within your group using research and visuals
Rubric Code:
T24X535
By
Eyoung15
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Math
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Metric System vs Imperial System
Needs Support
1 pts
Approaching Standards
2 pts
Meets Standards
3 pts
Exceeds Standards
4 pts
Observation
Needs Support
The student engagement is superficial and doesn't engage with the group/partner. The student is passive as they follow the directions but there is not a high level of energy or curiosity or energy within the group or pair about the side chosen for the debate.
Approaching Standards
The student is somewhat engaged in the group work but lets others take the lead. The student is following directions and shows some curiosity about the side chosen for the debate.
Meets Standards
The student is engaged in the group work and lets others contribute to the conversation. The student is curious about their learning, the inquiry process, and their side chosen.
Exceeds Standards
The student is engaged in the group work and encourages others to contribute to the conversation. The student is curious about their learning, the inquiry process, the side chosen as well as the opposing side.
Speaking and Communication
Needs Support
The student does not communicate ideas clearly. Stumbles. Unable to pronounce words clearly. The student employs basic communication skills and struggles to understand and use the terminology and vocabulary relevant to the metric and imperial system. The student does not display growth in understanding themselves as an independent learner.
Approaching Standards
The student has some difficulties communicating ideas. Difficulty with pronunciation. The student attempts to use the terminology and vocabulary relevant to the metric and imperial systems. The student is making attempts to understand themselves as an independent learner.
Meets Standards
The student in general speaks well. Ideas are generally clear. Minimal difficulty with the correct pronunciation. The student makes good use of the terminology and vocabulary relevant to the metric and imperial systems. Shows an emerging understanding of themselves as independent learners.
Exceeds Standards
The student's ideas are clear and are delivered in an eloquent fashion. Pronounced words correctly. The student appropriately uses the terminology and vocabulary relevant to the metric and imperial systems. The students clearly identify themselves as independent learners.
Content/Major Points
Needs Support
Did not defend chosen view. Points to defend their viewpoint were not clearly expressed and they did not support their answer in a highly persuasive manner.
Approaching Standards
Weakly defended chosen view. Many loopholes. Points to clearly express and defend their viewpoint were not made strongly and had a few details to defend their choice.
Meets Standards
Successfully defended chosen view but not strongly. Some loopholes. Had some justifications for their viewpoint in a persuasive manner but the choice could have been defended better.
Exceeds Standards
Successfully and strongly defended chosen view. Clearly expressed their viewpoint including at least three examples to support their choice in a highly persuasive manner.
Rebuttal
Needs Support
Counterarguments were not accurate and/or relevant. The group was unable to defend their rebuttal.
Approaching Standards
Some of the counterarguments were accurate, relevant, and strong. The group was able to defend their position
Meets Standards
The majority of the counterarguments were accurate, relevant, accurate, and strong. The group was able to defend their position.
Exceeds Standards
All counterarguments were accurate, relevant, and strong. The group was able to defend their position.
Research
Needs Support
No references utilized.
Approaching Standards
Utilized 1 reference.
Meets Standards
Utilized 2 references.
Exceeds Standards
Utilized 3 references.
Subjects:
Arts and Design
Math
Medical
Types:
Exam
Presentation
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Arts and Design rubrics
More Exam rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.