- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Hot Wheel's Lab- Group Assignment rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Hot Wheel's Lab- Group Assignment Rubric Code: SXAX665 By tashaholcombe Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Physics Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Hot Wheel's Lab- Group Assignment
	Fair 5 pts	Good 15 pts	Excellent 25 pts
Teamwork	Fair Team did not collaborate or communicate well. Some members would work independently, without regard to objectives or priorities. A lack of respect and regard was frequently noted.	Good The team worked well together most of the time, with only a few occurrences of communication breakdown or failure to collaborate when appropriate. Members were mostly respectful of each other.	Excellent The team worked well together to achieve objectives. Each member contributed in a valuable way to the project. All data sources indicated a high level of mutual respect and collaboration.
Contribution	Fair Many requirements and objectives are not identified, evaluated and/or completed. The deliverable offered no new information or approach to the topic under discussion. Few application considerations are analyzed and other factors were ignored or incompletely analyzed.	Good All requirements are identified and evaluated but some objectives are not completed. The deliverable offered some new information or approach to the topic under discussion. The application is reasonable; further analysis of some of the alternatives or constraints may have led to a different recommendation.	Excellent All requirements and objectives are identified, evaluated and competed. The deliverable offered new information or approach to the topic under discussion. Likewise, the application is based on stated criteria, analysis and constraints.
Supporting Material- Graphs	Fair Insufficient information was obtained and/or sources lack validity. Analysis and design considerationswere not supported by the information collected.	Good Sufficient information was obtained and most sources were valid. Analysis and design considerations were mostly supported by the information.	Excellent All relevant information was obtainedand information sourceswere valid. Analysis and design considerations were well supported by the information.
Following Directions	Fair Student did not follow directions, and as a result, did not achieve the investigations desired outcome.	Good Student followed directions somewhat but achieved only part of the investigation's desired outcome.	Excellent Students followed all directions and achieved the investigation's desired outcome.