iRubric: Task 3 - Perform Statistical Analysis rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Task 3 - Perform Statistical Analysis

This task will require students to determine the research question(s) of interest and operationalize the research question(s)

Rubric Code: S668BA

By agreen2

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Graduate

Task 1 - Research Question
	Excellent 3 pts	Average 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Research question(s)	Excellent Research question(s) is/are appropriate and clearly stated.	Average Research question(s) is/are appropriate and lacking important information.	Poor Research question(s) is/are inappropriate and/or missing altogether.
Survey- Rough Draft	Excellent	Average	Poor
Survey- Final Draft	Excellent	Average	Poor
Data Collection	Excellent Expected data types are clearly stated and explained.	Average Expected data types are stated and partially explained.	Poor Some expected data types are stated but not explained. No expected data types or explanations are given.
Data Evaluation
	Excellent 10 pts	Good 7 pts	Fair 4 pts
Analysis	Excellent	Good	Fair
Inference	Excellent	Good	Fair
Report
	Excellent 10 pts	Good 7 pts	Fair 4 pts
Final Written Report	Excellent	Good	Fair
Oral Presentation	Excellent	Good	Fair
Population & Sample	Excellent Population and sample are clearly stated. The sample size is appropriate and a good representation of the population. The type of random sample is clearly discussed and explained.	Good Population and sample are stated. The sample size is appropriate and a decent respresentation of the population. The type of random sample is quickly discussed and partially explained.	Fair Population and sample are stated. The sample size is not appropiate and not a good respresentation of the population. The type of random sample is stated, but not explained. No population or sampe is given. Sample size and type of random sample is not discussed.
Results & Predictions	Excellent Results are clearly stated and explained. Intelligent predictions are made with the full support of the data results.	Good Results are stated and partially explained. Predictions are made with little support of the data results.	Fair Results are stated but not explained. Predictions are made with no support of the data results. No results are discussed. No intelligent predictions are made based on the data results.
Box-and-Whisker Plot	Excellent Accurate and very neat. Number line is present and correct. Outliers are present and correct.	Good Accurate and neat. Number line is present but incorrect. Outliers are present but incorrect.	Fair Inaccurate and hard to read. Number line is missing. Outliers are missing. Box-and-whisker plot is missing altogether.
Stem-and-Leaf Plot	Excellent Accurate and very neat. Clearly stated key is provided.	Good Accurate and neat. Key is missing.	Fair Inaccurate and hard to read. Key is missing. Stem-and-leaf plot is missing altogether.
Questions	Excellent Missing none of the required questions.	Good Missing one of the required questions	Fair Missing two of the required questions. Zero of one of the required questions are answered
Histogram	Excellent Accurate and very near. Correct z-scores. Includes all labels and characteristics of a good graph.	Good Accurate and neat. Incorrect z-scores. Missing some labels and some characteristics of a good graph.	Fair Inaccurate and hard to read. Not based on z-scores. Missing labels and characteristics of a good graph. Histogram is missing altogether.
Box-and-Whisker Plot	Excellent Neat and easy to read. No mathematical errors.	Good Neat and easy to read. A few mathematical errors.	Fair Somewhat neat and easy to read. Some mathematical mistakes or some incorrect formulas used.
Histogram	Excellent Neat and easy to read. No mathematical errors.	Good Neat and easy to read. A few mathematical errors.	Fair Somewhat neat and easy to read. Some mathematical mistakes or some incorrect formulas used. Not neat and unable to read. Calculations missing altogether or many mathematical mistakes or no correct formulas used.
Measures of Central Tendency	Excellent Neat and easy to read. No mathematical errors.	Good Neat and easy to read. A few mathematical errors.	Fair Somewhat neat and easy to read. Some mathematical mistakes or some incorrect formulas used. Not neat and unable to read. Calculations missing altogether or many mathematical mistakes or no correct formulas used.

Keywords:

statistics, survey, inference, analysis,

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric