Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Power and the Individual Paper/Presentation Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Power and the Individual Paper/Presentation Rubric
Research Project Presentation Rubric
Rubric Code:
RXC828B
By
CaryHall
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
P&I Paper/Presentation
Remember, this is your FINAL EXAM. In total, this project is worth 20% of your grade for this semester.
Poor
(F)
0 pts
Limited
(D)
1 pts
Fair
(C)
2 pts
Good
(B)
3 pts
Excellent
(A)
4 pts
Context, Pt. 1
Poor
Does not Introduce the work (speech, article, song, film, etc.) to be discussed. Gives no, or entirely irrelevant, background on the speaker.
Limited
Introduces the work (speech, article, song, film, etc.) to be discussed insufficiently. Gives irrelevant or insufficient background on the speaker.
Fair
Introduces the work (speech, article, song, film, etc.) to be discussed vaguely. Gives some relevant background on the speaker.
Good
Introduces the work (speech, article, song, film, etc.) to be discussed. Gives mostly relevant and sufficient background on the speaker.
Excellent
Introduces the work (speech, article, song, film, etc.) to be discussed and gives background on the speaker, with all relevant information and with nothing irrelevant.
Context, Pt. 2
Poor
Gives no relevant information necessary to fully comprehending the message of the work: not having considered current events, history, communities, traditions, etc.
Limited
Gives little relevant information necessary to fully comprehending the message of the work, having only vaguely considered current events, history, communities, traditions, etc.
Fair
Gives some relevant information necessary to fully comprehending the message of the work, having somewhat considered current events, history, communities, traditions, etc.
Good
Gives most of the relevant information necessary to fully comprehending the message of the work, having mostly considered current events, history, communities, traditions, etc.
Excellent
Gives all relevant information necessary to fully comprehending the message of the work, having considered current events, history, communities, traditions, etc.
Comprehension & Analysis
Poor
The connotative and/or denotative meanings are misunderstood and/or miscommunicated to the audience.
Limited
The connotative and denotative meanings are shallowly understood and communicated to the audience, but with major lapses in comprehension or analysis of message.
Fair
The connotative and denotative meanings are partially understood and communicated to the audience, with some lapses in comprehension or analysis of message.
Good
The connotative and denotative meanings are understood and communicated to the audience, with some minor lapses in comprehension or analysis of message.
Excellent
Both the connotative and denotative meanings are understood and successfully communicated to the audience.
Relationship to Theme
Poor
Provided a vague interpretation of the work through the lens of Power & the Individual. Made no attempt to tie the work to issues of the twenty-first century.
Limited
Provided a vague interpretation of the work through the lens of Power & the Individual. Made little attempt to tie the work to issues of the twenty-first century.
Fair
Provided a somewhat convincing interpretation of the work through the lens of Power & the Individual. Partially succeeded in tying the work to issues of the twenty-first century.
Good
Provided a mostly clear and convincing interpretation of the work through the lens of Power & the Individual. Successfully tied the work to issues of the twenty-first century.
Excellent
Provided a clear and convincing interpretation of the work through the lens of Power & the Individual. Successfully tied the work to issues of the twenty-first century.
Bibliography & Material
Poor
No sources are cited on a Works Cited page or slide in MLA format. Missing in-text citations within the essay or presentation. Did not provided audience with access to the work being discussed.
Limited
No sources are cited on a Works Cited page or slide in MLA format. And/or missing in-text citations within the essay or presentation.
May not have provided audience with access to the work being discussed.
Fair
No sources are cited on a Works Cited page or slide in MLA format. And/or missing in-text citations within the essay or presentation.
Provided audience with access to the work being discussed.
Good
All sources used are cited on a Works Cited page or slide in MLA format with in-text citations within the essay or presentation.
Provided audience with access to the work being discussed.
Excellent
All sources used are cited on a Works Cited page or slide in MLA format with in-text citations within the essay or presentation.
Provided audience with access to the work being discussed.
Presentation Standards
Poor
Speaker is not well-practiced and has a shallow depth of knowledge, may be at times inaudible, may have little eye contact, and is overly reliant on notes or long pauses. The slides are overly simplistic or overly complex. The slides show effort to do the minimum.
Limited
Speaker is somewhat practiced and has a shallow depth of knowledge, is mostly audible, makes some eye contact, reliant on notes or long pauses. The slides may be overly simplistic or overly complex. The slides show effort to do the minimum.
Fair
Speaker is somewhat practiced and knowledgeable, is audible, often makes eye contact, but may be reliant on notes or long pauses. The slides may be overly simplistic or overly complex. The slides show effort to do the minimum.
Good
Speaker is well practiced and knowledgeable, is audible, often makes eye contact, and is not overly reliant on notes or long pauses. The slides support the presenter, instead of the presenter supporting the slides. The slides show effort to do well, not to do the bare minimum.
Excellent
Speaker is clearly practiced and knowledgeable, is audible, consistently makes eye contact, and is not reliant on notes or long pauses. The slides support the presenter, instead of the presenter supporting the slides. The slides show effort to do well, not to do the bare minimum.
Essay Standards
Poor
The essay is often incoherent, incohesive, and poorly-structured. Style shows little attempt to display skill. Contains many errors in grammar, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation. Contains contractions or slang.
Limited
The essay is only partially coherent, cohesive, and structured. Style shows little attempt to display skill. Contains several errors in grammar, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation. Contains contractions or slang.
Fair
The essay is mostly coherent, cohesive, and well-structured. Style shows moderate skill. Contains some errors in grammar, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation. Contains no contractions or slang.
Good
The essay is coherent, cohesive, and well-structured. Some skillful use of style. Contains a few errors in grammar, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation. Contains no contractions or slang.
Excellent
The essay is coherent, cohesive, and well-structured. Skillful use of style. Contains very few errors in grammar, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation. Contains no contractions or slang.
Overall Quality/Effort
Poor
The assignment was not taken seriously at all and was not important to the student. And/or the content and communication were not engaging. And/or student did not respect others.
Limited
The assignment was not taken seriously and was not important to the student. Or the content and communication were not interesting/engaging. Or student did not respect others.
Fair
The assignment was taken somewhat seriously and was somewhat important to the student. The content and communication were somewhat interesting/engaging. Student respected others.
Good
The assignment was mostly taken seriously and was mostly important to the student. The content and telling of the research were mostly interesting/engaging. Student respected others.
Excellent
Clearly shows that the assignment was taken seriously and was important to the student. The content of the research and the telling were quite interesting/ engaging. Student showed great respect for others.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.