Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Document-based Persuasive Essay w/Citations rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Document-based Persuasive Essay w/Citations
Write a 750 word, five-paragraph persuasive argument in which you use what you have learned in this module on food to support a claim about the 'link' between nutrition and human development. You must cite at least six sources; include in-text citation and a Works Cited page; and follow the CCSS Writing and Language Standards.
Rubric Code:
R92524
By
rmcapozzi
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12, Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Persuasive Essay
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Claim
Excellent
The claim is clearly discernible and it is stated along with three logical reasons as part of overview. The argument is sound and consistently supported with well-chosen evidence.
Good
The claim takes a clear position. Argument and evidence may at times be strained. One support par. may veer off topic, or examples may be lacking.
Fair
The claim is weak, wordy, and/or garbled.
Argument and/or evidence is weak or does not always support the claim. Supporting pars. may veer off topic.
Poor
No claim. Argument and evidence do not connect or support one point.
Supporting paragraphs are disconnected.
Organization
Excellent
Essay is focused and organized by design.
Pars. have clear topic/concluding sentences; body paragraphs include counterarguments with refutation & effective transitions.
Good
Essay is organized.
Pars. have topic and concluding sentences; body paragraphs may incl. counterarguments and refutation, or not; and/or lack transitions; and/or lack an overall design.
Fair
Some confusion due to lack of organization.
Has weak topic and/or concluding sentence; and body paragraphs include
weak counterargument and ineffective rebuttal. Transitions are weak or absent.
Poor
No organization. Pars. have no apparent topic and/or concluding sentence; body paragraphs lack counterarguments and/or rebuttal. No transitions.
Analysis
Excellent
Claim is fully developed and supported. Evidence is vivid and relevant. Analysis shows insightful reflection with highly effective use of persuasive strategies.
Good
Claim is well developed and supported with good evidence. Analysis shows understanding with some use of persuasive strategies.
Fair
Claim is not well supported by evidence. Analysis shows partial understanding; inconsistent persuasive strategies.
Poor
Claim is not supported by evidence or analysis.
Voice & Tone
Excellent
Consistently uses a variety in word choice and sentence structure.
Strong unique voice adds polished style to the writing; tone is consistent with purpose throughout.
Good
Shows some variety in word choice and/or sentence structure.
Uses own voice, but style may be rough. Tone is consistent with purpose, but may include one or two abrupt shifts
Fair
Not enough variety in sentence structure and/or word choice.
Voice and tone are well suited, but do not stand out or are highly inconsistent.
Poor
Sentence structure is repetitive and word choice is basic. Voice is undeveloped and tone is inconsistent.
Citation
Excellent
Six sources are cited using in-text citation and an alphabetized Works Cited page. All quotes & paraphrases introduced using title and author; & citations are in correct MLA format.
Good
4-5 sources are cited using in-text citation and a Works Cited page. All quotes & paraphrases introduced using title and author; & citations are in correct MLA format.
Fair
3-4 sources are cited but may lack in-text citations; Works Cited page is attempted. Quotes & paraphrases may be introduced using title and/or author, but citations are not in correct MLA format.
Poor
Fewer than 3 sources are cited; in-text citation is not used & the Works Cited page is missing. Quotes & paraphrases are not introduced; & citations are not in correct MLA format.
Mechanics
Excellent
Errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation are few and do not interfere with understanding.
Good
Semi-frequent errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation do not interfere with understanding.
Fair
Errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation sometimes interfere with understanding.
Poor
Errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation prevent reader from fully understanding the essay.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.