iRubric: IUP Presentation Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

IUP Presentation Rubric

Students will research information related to the topic(s) and present their findings to peers during a brief in-class presentation.

Rubric Code: R2699W

By f200703

Ready to use

Private Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12

Presentation
	Exceeds 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Presentation Content	Exceeds Presentation was completely developed and included all 9 focus points: 1. Name and population of country 2. Political influences or concerns 3. Economics of country 4. Causes and solutions of global climate change 5. Cultural impact and response 6. Natural resources 7. Main environmental concerns - does it differ from USA? 8. Short and long-term goals to address climate change 9. Any other key info	Good Presentation was mostly developed and included most (5-8) focus points	Fair Presentation was somewhat developed and covered only a few (2-4) focus points	Poor Presentation was not developed and included one or no focus points
Quality/Effort	Exceeds The presentation demonstrated full effort and pride in work. The effort that was put into this task is the best it can be by the learners.	Good The presentation was done with good effort that shows what the learners are capable of. It is evident that time was put into this presentation.	Fair The presentation was done with fair effort, but the quality is still not what the learners are capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed.	Poor The presentation was done with little effort, quality is not what the learners are capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed and little time was spent on the final product.
Style/Creativity	Exceeds The presentation had an element of creativity and style.	Good The presentation was somewhat creative.	Fair The presentation lacked style and creativity.	Poor The presentation was not creative.
Participation / Enthusiasm	Exceeds All students in the group took an active role in presenting information. Delivered with great enthusiasm.	Good Most students in the group took an active role in presenting information. Delivered with some enthusiasm.	Fair Only a few students in the group took an active role in presenting information. Delivered with little enthusiasm.	Poor None of the students in the group took an active role in presenting information. Delivered with no enthusiasm.
Time Management	Exceeds The group expertly managed its time in order to cover all key content focus points. (Target time = 20-25 minutes)	Good The group somewhat managed its time and was able to cover most key content focus points.	Fair The group did not effectively manage its time. Some key content focus points skimmed or missed.	Poor The group did not manage its time at all. Presentation either too long or too short to be effective.
Portfolio Inclusion	Exceeds The group heavily relied on information and materials from its unit portfolio to support the presentation. Includes performance of song from music class (musical ability not considered).	Good The group presented only some materials from its unit portfolio. Includes performance of song from music class (musical ability not considered).	Fair The group presented little material from its portfolio. Song performance not included in presentation.	Poor The group presented no material and / or made no reference to its portfolio.

Keywords:

Climate Change Asia

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric