Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Global Perspectives: Energy & Power rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Global Perspectives: Energy & Power
Science Fair and abstract
Rubric Code:
R23X699
By
Poplap1
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Energy & Power Points
No Project/Incomplete/Poor
4 pts
Fair
6 pts
Good
8 pts
Excellent
10 pts
Abstract and Referencing
No Project/Incomplete/Poor
Abstract is missing more than one required element and/or/contains spelling/grammar issues that impair understanding.
Referencing missing or poorly done.
Fair
Abstract is missing one of the required elements and/or contains multiple grammar and/or spelling errors.
Referencing missing or poorly done.
Good
Abstract contains a description of the experiment with all required elements, but contains errors in grammar and/or spelling.
Referencing done, but missing some elements
Excellent
Abstract contains a concise, well-written description of the experiment, including hypothesis, variables, procedure, and conclusion.
Referencing to standard.
Purpose/Problem statement
No Project/Incomplete/Poor
Problem Statement is missing or does not identify purpose of project.
Fair
Problem Statement is not clear or does not specifically identify purpose.
Good
Problem Statement is identifies purpose, but is not completely specific or focused.
Excellent
Problem Statement is clearly stated and readily identifies the purpose of the project.
Hypothesis
No Project/Incomplete/Poor
Hypothesis is unrelated to the purpose of the project. It is not tested throughout the project. Did not mention dependent and independent variables.
Fair
Hypothesis is stated correctly, but does not correlate to the purpose of the project and is not testable.Variables were not completely described or were incorrectly classified as dependent or independent.
Good
Hypothesis correlates to the purpose but is not stated as an if/then/because statement. Hypothesis refutes or defends established knowledge. Variables were identified and classified as dependent and independent.
Excellent
Hypothesis is testable and directly correlates to the purpose. It is stated as an if/then/because statement. Provides references showing that hypothesis refutes or defends established knowledge. Variables were classified as dependent and independent.
Materials
No Project/Incomplete/Poor
Materials are not appropiate for the experiment or list of materials missing.
Fair
Materials are missing a few things the teacher feels could add to the accuracy of the experiment. List did not show details about items used.
Good
Materials are appropiate for the experiment but reproducibility is uncertain. List was not specific for all items regarding sizes and units of measurement.
Excellent
Materials are appropiate for the experiment and reproducibility is possible, though limited to certain audiences. Showed information about size and units of measurement.
Procedure
No Project/Incomplete/Poor
Student did not use appropiate materials and incorrectly stated the procedure so that anyone wishing to do the experiment gets varied results.
Fair
Student used appropiate materials and stated the procedure so that anyone wishing to do the experiment can perform it but must guess what to do at more than 2 steps.
Good
Student used appropiate materials and stated the procedure so that anyone wishing to do the experiment can perform it but must guess what to do at 1-2 steps.
Excellent
Student used appropiate materials and correctly stated the procedure so that anyone wishing to do the experiment can perform it and get the same results.
Data-Tables & Graphs
No Project/Incomplete/Poor
No axes are labeled. It is unclear what the data represents without referring to the written results.
Fair
Some axes are labeled. Results must be referenced (more than twice) to gain an understanding of the data.
Good
Most axes are labeled. Results must be referenced (at least once) to gain an understanding of the data.
Excellent
All axes are labeled. Data is understood but results may have to be referenced.
Results
No Project/Incomplete/Poor
Does not explain the data. Unclear what happened in the experiment after reading the results.
Fair
Somewhat explains the data but the reader must see a chart or graph to gain a clear understanding of the project's results.
Good
Almost explains data and tells what happened in the experiement. The reader must see a chart or graph to gain a clear understanding of the project's results.
Excellent
Mostly explains data and tells what happened in the experiement with one question. If no data were provided, a reader would still understand what happened in the experiment.
Conclusion
No Project/Incomplete/Poor
Student neither explains the results of the experiment nor tells if the hypothesis was correct or incorrect.
Fair
Student explains if hypothesis was correct or incorrect.
Good
Student explains the results of the project but leaves some question about what was supposed to happen and what actually did. Student explains if hypothesis was proved or refuted.
Excellent
Student explains the results of the project and draws a difference between what was supposed to happen and what actually did. Student explains if hypothesis was proved or refuted. Student exemplifies an understanding of the scientific process.
Presentation
No Project/Incomplete/Poor
Not neat and seems haphazardly thrown together. Steps from the scientific process may or may not be out of order.
Fair
Neatly put together. More than two steps of the scientific process are out of order.
Good
Neatly put together. One to two steps of the scientific process are out of order.
Excellent
Presentation neatly put together. All steps are in order. Nothing missing.
Model
No Project/Incomplete/Poor
Model is not working or neat and is missing items.
Fair
Model is not neat or neat and is missing items.
Good
Model is neat, but missing an item or not working.
Excellent
Model is neat, care went into the construction of it and works with all its parts complete
Keywords:
science fair
Subjects:
Science
Social Sciences
Types:
Project
Presentation
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.