iRubric: rubric for a collaborative wiki project

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

rubric for a collaborative wiki project

This rubric is designed for a collaborative wiki project. In the project, learners are expected to research an assigned computer fundamentals topic on the Internet, write out the facts on the two oceans. Write an article about their assigned topic. After completed, they set up their wiki pages, post their article, and invite their peers to visit their website and post their comments.

Rubric Code: QCX8A4

By Madchelle

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 6-8

Rubric for a collaborative Wiki pro
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellant (N/A)
Research skills	Poor Learners can research assigned topic on the Internet, however, they identify less than three of the Key words in the topic.	Fair Learners can research the topic on the Internet, identify 3-5 of the key words in the topic.	Good Learners can research the topic on the Internet, identify 5-7 of the key words on the topic, which could attract their audience.	Excellant Learners can research the topic on the Internet, identify 7-9 of the key words on the topic, which could attract their audience.
Writing skills	Poor Learners can write an article for the topic, but their writing is less than 100 words. Less than 5 facts are modified. Their writing is not clear, their grammatical and vocaburary errors hinder comprehension.	Fair Learners can write an articles of assigned topic with over 100-250 words. 5 facts are modified. Their writing is very clear, but there is some grammatical and vocabulary mistakes.	Good Learners can write an articles of assigned topic with over 250-400 words. 10 facts are modified. Their writing is very clear, use appropriate grammar and words.	Excellant Learners can write an articles of assigned topic with over 400-500 words. 15 facts are modified. Their writing is very clear. Strong word choice and sentence fluency. Each sentence is descriptive and detailed; use appropriate grammar and words.
Visuals	Poor Learners can incorporate images, but the images are not relevent to the topic. Wiki had three or less hyperlinks to reference resources.	Fair Learners can incorporate images, which is relevant to their topic, but quality of images is not good; not clear or bad angle. Wiki had five or less hyperlinks to reference resources.	Good Learners can incorporate images and (7) hyperlinks, which are relevant to their topic, and enhance comprehension of their readers.	Excellant Learners can incorporate images, sounds, videos and 8-9 hyperlinks, which are relevant to their topic and enhance comprehension of their readers.
Setting up wiki skills	Poor Learners set up 2 out of 7 wiki pages and only for their guests after the due date. Their page set up has problems, their guests cannot enroll in their pages.	Fair Learners can set up 4 out of 7 wiki pages and only for their guests, and post their article by due date. But their labels for the pages is not clear and difficult to navigate.	Good Learners can set up 5 out of the 7 wiki pages only for their guests, and post their article by due date. They use effective labels so that their guests can easily navigate.	Excellant Learners cans set up 6-7 wiki pages and their guest. Post article by due date. They use effective labels so that their guest can easily navigate.
Comment skills	Poor Learners cannot find out how to use comment functions in wiki, or did not respond to their peer's article.	Fair Learners can use comment functions in wiki, and respond to their peers. They compare their peer's article and original article, and identify less than 5 changed facts, and respond to the writer.	Good Learners can use comment functions in wiki, and respond to their peers. They compare their peer's article and original article, and identify 10 changed facts, and respond to the writer.	Excellant Learners can use comments functions in wiki, and respond to their peers. They compare their peer's article and original article, and identify 15 changed facts and respond to the writer.
Timelines	Poor Project turned in two or more days late.	Fair Project turned in one day late	Good Project turned in at the end of the day.	Excellant Project turned in at the beginning of class.
Respect	Poor Lack of respect evident in group interaction.	Fair Evidence of respect given intermittently between group members.	Good Respect given to group members most of the time.	Excellant Each member treat all team members' ideas/person with respect at all times and other teams.
Collaboration & Contribution	Poor * Did not complete their part of the project and failed to work with any of the team members. * Work was completed by one person in the group.	Fair * Needs to co-operate & help with their group. * Needs to help different group teams. * Needs to stay on task. * Work was only completed by two of the group members.	Good * Sometimes worked for the group. * Finished own part but did not assist the team. * Work was complete by 3/4 of the group members.	Excellant * All people in the group had a role. * Group consulted the each member to make decision & help each other. * All contributed equally to the finished product. * Group members put the group before themselves and co-operated.

Keywords:

Wiki project, collabotative, rubric, social science learners

Subjects:

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric