iRubric: Personal Leadership Development Plan_General Leadership_IUCA rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Personal Leadership Development Plan_General Leadership_IUCA

Personal Leadership Development Plan BUSI5020

This rubric is used for an undergraduate General Leadership class

Rubric Code: Q2XX8B8

By gp3745

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: (Other)

Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Personal Leadership Development
	Poor 6 pts	Fair 8 pts	Good 10 pts
Self Analysis	Poor May mention some strengths and weaknesses, but there is nothing further discussed or there is no comparison to personal goals.	Fair Analyzes ones own strengths and weaknesses, but may not contain additional development and self-exploration or comparison to personal goals.	Good Effectively analyzes own strengths and weaknesses. This includes additional development and self-exploration of each key leadership component and comparison of personal goals.
Personal and Leadership Goals	Poor Brief discussion, or no discussion, of some specific personal leadership goals. Little additional development or insight. Few of the SMART elements included.	Fair Discussion of personal leadership goals may or may not include minimally developed. May not have additional insight. At least three of the SMART elements included.	Good High-level discussion of leadership development goals. Well-thought out applicable goals. All SMART elements included.
Organization, Structure & Content	Poor -Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.<BR> -Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts. -Little, no, or low-quality Introduction & Conclusion -Content is incomplete.<BR> - Major points are not clear and / or persuasive.	Fair - Structure of the paper is not easy to follow.<BR> - Paragraph transitions need improvement. -Very basic-level Introduction & Conclusion - Major points are addressed, but not well supported.<BR> - Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.	Good - Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.<BR> - Paragraph transitions are present and logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper. - Clear, interesting and professional-level Introduction & Conclusion - Content is accurate.<BR> - Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.<BR> - Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Grammar, Punctuation, & Spelling	Poor - Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.<BR> - Language used large amounts of Russian-English and/or Kyrgyz-English.	Fair - Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.<BR> - Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some Russian-English and/or Kyrgyz-English.	Good - Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.<BR> - Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.