Skip to main content
iRubric: International Business Case Study rubric

iRubric: International Business Case Study rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
International Business Case Study 
Rubric Code: Q2W9W9B
By gailt182
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Business  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Trait
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

5 pts

Good

10 pts

Excellent

16 pts

Identifies the corprorate strategy

Poor

Does not identify and summarize the corporate strategy, is confused or identifies a different or inappropriate strategy.
Fair

Identifies the main strategy(ies) and subsidiary, embedded, or implicit aspects of the strategy.
Good

Identifies only the basics of the strategy, but recognizes differences of the strategy.
Excellent

Identifies not only the basics of the strategy, but recognizes differences of the strategy.
Key Assumptions

Poor

Does not surface the assumptions that underlie the strategy.
Fair

Identifies some of the key assumptions.
Good

Identifies most of the assumptions.
Excellent

Identifies and questions the validity of the key assumptions that underlie the strategy.
Environmental

Poor

Lacked any mention of environmental impacts.
Fair

Mentioned environmental elements in discussion but did not give specific examples of how the case study considered environmental impacts.
Good

Gave one example of minimizing negative environmental impacts.
Excellent

Multiple examples of efforts to minimize negative environmental impacts such as decreased air pollution, material recycling, waste minimization, minimized energy consumption, etc.
Economic

Poor

Lacked any mention of cost, local economic benefits, etc.
Fair

Mentioned cost or economics but did not show how the case study was a sustainable example.
Good

Gave one example of how the case study met an economic sustainability goal.
Excellent

Discussed multiple innovations that saved taxpayer money, provided jobs, etc.
Evidence of strategy

Poor

Simply lists examples of actions or behaviors that represent the strategy. Does not discuss the relevance of these actions or behaviors.
Fair

Discusses the relevance of actions and behaviors representing the strategies.
Good

Discusses differences of the examples in detail.
Excellent

Discusses the differences and compares/contrast examples in detail
Social Cultural

Poor

Lacked any mention of social cultural benefits
Fair

Mentioned social cultural benefits but did not give a concrete example that pertained to the case study.
Good

Gave one example of how the project provided positive social cultural benefits to tried to minimize negative social impacts.
Excellent

Gave multiple examples that community input considered, contributed in a positive way to the country. considered social equity. etc.
Technologically

Poor

Lacked any mention of technological benefits.
Fair

Mentioned technological benefits but did not give a concrete example that pertained to the case study.
Good

Gave one example of how the project provided positive technological benefits
Excellent

Gave multiple examples that technology input considered, contributed in a positive way to the country.
Conclusions, implications, conseque

Poor

Fails to identify conclusions, implications, and consequences of the strategy
Fair

Identifies and discusses conclusions, implications, and consequences.
Good

Objectivity, reflects upon own analysis of the corporate strategy.
Excellent

Objectivity, reflects upon own analysis of the corporate strategy. Using data, compare/contrast techniques.
Writing mechanics

Poor

Does not use proper grammar/punctuation or spelling throughout the paper. Does not have a proper academic style. Writing is not well organized and not logically consistent. Writing is rambling.
Did not follow MLA citations. Plagiarism checker has more than 50%
Fair

Uses inconsistent grammar, punctuation, or spelling throughout the paper. Some of the sentences are ineffective and not not make sense. Did not follow MLA; plagiarism checker has more than 25%
Good

For the most part, the student uses proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling and writes reasonable effective sentences that generally make logical sense. Followed most of the MLA rules/guidelines and plagiarism is less than 10%
Excellent

Use proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling and writes effective sentences that make logical sense. Writing is well organized and logically coherent. Followed MLA citations, plagiarism checker less than 5% or not detected.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16