iRubric: Wiki Page Review and Peer Assessment rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Wiki Page Review and Peer Assessment

is a collaborative evaluation process in which students review, analyze, and provide constructive feedback on their classmates’ wiki pages.

Rubric Code: Q252787

By sophiadelpilar

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Homework

Grade Levels: 9-12, Graduate, Post Graduate

CRITERIA 100 % Content Relevance and Accuracy
	EXCELLENT Accurate, relevant, deep understanding; all key points addressed. 12.5 pts	GOOD Mostly accurate and relevant; minor omissions. 8.5 pts	REGULAR Some Inaccuracies; missing important points. 5 pts	DEFICIENT Inaccurate or irrelevant content. 2 pts
Structure and Clarity 12.5 %	EXCELLENT Well structured, logical, easy to follow.	GOOD Adequate structure; some sections need clarity.	REGULAR Weak organization; difficult to follow.	DEFICIENT No structure; confusing to read.
Use of Sources and References 12.5 %	EXCELLENT High-quality credible sources; all properly cited.	GOOD Credible sources; minor citation issues.	REGULAR Few sources or unclear citations.	DEFICIENT No sources or unreliable references.
Multimedia Integration 12.5 %	EXCELLENT Relevant multimedia enhances content and learning.	GOOD Multimedia present but not fully Integrated.	REGULAR Minimal multimedia; weak Integration.	DEFICIENT No multimedia or irrelevant elements.
Peer Evaluation Reflection 12.5 %	EXCELLENT Thoughtful, constructive, detailed feedback.	GOOD Clear reflection but lacking depth..	REGULAR Brief or general reflection.	DEFICIENT Missing or unhelpful reflection.
Writing Quality 12.5 %	EXCELLENT Clear academic writing; no grammar errors.	GOOD Minor errors; meaning remains clear.	REGULAR Several errors affecting readability.	DEFICIENT Many errors; difficult to understand.
Peer Review Quality 12.5 %	EXCELLENT Provides constructive, specific, and respectful feedback that improves peers’ work.	GOOD Feedback is clear and helpful but could be more detailed.	REGULAR Feedback is basic and lacks depth.	DEFICIENT Little or no feedback provided.
Participation & Responsibility 12.5 %	EXCELLENT Consistently participates and meets deadlines.	GOOD Usually participates and meets deadlines.	REGULAR Participation is inconsistent.	DEFICIENT Rarely participates or misses deadlines.