iRubric: Janine Weisman - Speech Critique Paper rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Janine Weisman - Speech Critique Paper

Speech Critique Paper

Analysis of live on-campus lecture.

Rubric Code: PXC9C37

By Kevin1952

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Communication

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Criteria
	Excellent 25 pts	Good 21 pts	Fair 17.5 pts	Poor 13.5 pts	No Evidence 0 pts
Details of Speaker & Occasion	Excellent Correctly identifies all of the following: speaker's name and title, date, time, location and audience size of the event; provides thorough background information on speaker and the occasion.	Good Correctly identifies all but one of the following: speaker's name and title, date, time, location and audience size of the event; provides some background information on speaker and the occasion.	Fair Identifies some of the following: speaker's name and title, date, time, location and audience size of the event; provides no background information on speaker and the occasion.	Poor Identifies speaker's name but provides few other details about the speech occasion. No background information on speaker given.	No Evidence No Evidence
Critical Thinking/Analytical Skills	Excellent Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of the speaker's talk and how effective it was; offers many details and examples; consistently demonstrates the use of critical thinking/analytical skills.	Good Presents a thorough analysis of most of the speaker's talk and how effective it was; offers details and examples; consistently demonstrates the use of critical thinking/analytical skills.	Fair Presents a superficial analysis of some of the speaker's talk; offers a few details; minimal demonstration of the use of critical thinking/analytical skills	Poor Presents an incomplete analysis of some of the speaker's talk; offers no details or examples to support analyses; demonstrates little or no use of critical thinking/analytical skills.	No Evidence No Evidence
Writing Quality/Organization	Excellent The paper is extremely well organized, makes excellent transitions from point to point, and makes no spelling or grammatical errors.	Good The paper is generally well organized with relatively smooth transitions from point to point and very few spelling or grammatical errors.	Fair The paper is organized with somewhat smooth transitions from point to point; there are some spelling or grammatical errors.	Poor The paper is minimally well organized with minimally acceptable transitions from point to point; there are many spelling or grammatical errors.	No Evidence No Evidence
Length	Excellent Length is 3 double-spaced pages or more.	Good Length is 3 double-spaced pages.	Fair Length is 2 double-spaced pages.	Poor Length is 1 double-spaced page.	No Evidence
Use of Quotations	Excellent Provides two or more relevant and interesting quotes from the speaker with proper punctuation. Offers analysis of why and when speaker said these statements. Quotes highlight speaker's use of language or an insightful or emotional point during speech.	Good Provides one relevant quote with proper punctuation. Offers interpretation of the quote	Fair Provides a quote that appears stuck into paper for no reason or without interpretation. No apparent reason for use of quote in paper other than to make it longer.	Poor Inaccurately transcribed quote or used mundane, unnecessary quote that fails to move the critique along.	No Evidence No Evidence

Subjects:

Communication

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric