Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Oedipus Mock Trial rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Oedipus Mock Trial
Supreme Court Mock Trial
Rubric Code:
PXA6698
By
lindamichael
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Enter rubric title
Excellent
8 pts
Good
6.5 pts
Fair
5 pts
Poor
2 pts
Written Response
Excellent
The background research was thorough and well thought out. Included all major facts and arguments of the case that pertained to your position. Cites 5-6 points in drama.
Good
Research was well thought out and has most of the key facts and arguments about the case. Cites 3-4 points in drama.
Fair
Research was done but is missing key details and arguments. Briefly goes over case history. Included only 1-3 points.
Poor
Research was incomplete or not done at all.
The "Brief"
Excellent
The brief is well written and includes no spelling or gramatical errors. It includes each of the required sections in the right format. Includes strong analysis and well thought out arguments.
Good
The brief is well written but includes 1-4 spelling or gramatical errors. Each of the required sections are included. Good analysis and arguments.
Fair
The brief is completed but includes 5-9 spelling and gramatical errors. The brief is missing a required section. An attempt to analyze the material was made but didn't go far enough.
Poor
The brief was missing 2 major sections or was not completed at all. Many gramatical and spelling errors. No attempt at analysis is made.
The Debate
Excellent
Strong persuasive argument is made. Followed the format. Professional, courteous, and well organized.
Good
Persuasive arguments were made. Professinal and organized. Missed 1 key point or argument. Followed the format and appeared professional and organized.
Fair
Appeared professional. Somewhat disorganized. Made most of key points but lacked persuasiveness.
Poor
Unable to make several of their key points. Didn't follow the format of the debate. Appeared unprofessional and unorganized. Disrespectful of others during debate.
Group Work/Individual Work
Excellent
Group/Individual worked well together. Every group member participated in the research, writing the brief, and the debate.
Good
Group worked well together. Every member participated in 2 of the three parts of the assignment.
Fair
Group struggled to work together. Members attempted to work together. One portion of the group seemed to be carrying the load.
Poor
Group did not work well together. One member seemed to carry the work load or members split up and worked on different parts of the assignment without helping or consulting one another.
Subjects:
English
Political Science
Types:
Presentation
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.