iRubric: HESC623 Health Informatics rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

HESC623 Health Informatics

Community Health Nursing 4173

Rubric Code: PX95XX3

By mrtassi

Draft

Private Rubric

Subject: Health

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Project Presentation 100 % Group Assignment
	Below Expectations 1 1 pts	Meets Minimal Expectations 2 2 pts	Proficient, Exceeds Expectations 3 3 pts	Exemplary, Excellent 4 4 pts
Scholarly standards 25 % Lists goals of the paper with pertinent details. Then discuss ethical considerations to apply. Assignments should reflect an adequate knowledge of the topic, an understanding of underlying principles, synthesis of content, and interpretation of the subject with creative thought.	Below Expectations Substantial inaccuracies in use of the references and understanding of the content. Elaboration of evidence is insufficient or not understandable to the reader. Does not follow in a logical format. Difficult for the reader to understand what points are opinion and what points are supportive. Does not convey organized thoughts. Does not address 3 or more	Meets Minimal Expectations Doesn't fully address other viewpoints and/or doesn't clarify own views. Writer's perspective is acceptable, but not easy to follow. Attempts to follow logical format, but wonders from one concept to another without clear flow or rational. Thoughts are not well organized. Does not address 2 or more of questions.	Proficient, Exceeds Expectations Elaborates on resources for building a successful career in community health nursing, but does not clarify or support own views. Writer's perspective is acceptable but not sequentially formatted. Attempts to follow logical format, but with less consistency. Flow of paper may result in confusion between writer's opinions and supported, evidenced-based reports. Does not address 1 or mor	Exemplary, Excellent Elaborates fully on clearly laying out a successful career path in an area of CHN, professional sources. Has defined the concepts discussed, and uses clear and effective examples. Answers the questions: 1)What is my selected CHN career? 2)Does what I say make a clear career path? 3)Can readers discern my opinions from the evidence used to support them? 4)Identify a level of prevention useful for nurse in the specified role.
Accuracy and Understanding Content 20 % The student is able to demonstrate content (factual) knowledge and understanding of material addressed in question.	Below Expectations Major objectives are not identified. Insufficient information<BR> Not identifying or addressing a key concept or main ideas	Meets Minimal Expectations Barely touching on the relevant content, poorly identifying and addressing a key concept or main idea, not substantiating points with relevant or accurate examples,	Proficient, Exceeds Expectations Correctly addressing the most critical content, identifying and addressing some of the key concepts or main ideas, substantiating some points with accurate examples	Exemplary, Excellent All important objectives are identified. <BR> Exemplary understanding of the presented issue(s) by thoroughly and correctly (1) addressing the relevant content, (2)identifying and addressing the key concepts or main ideas, (3) substantiating points with several accurate examples
Originality 15 % All assignments are expected to reflect original thoughts and interpretations of the information. Direct quotations should be kept to a minimum and used only when they enhance the message you are trying to convey. The topic posed is only part of the total. Does student find interesting angles from which to explore? All assignments are expected to reflect original thoughts and interpretations of the information.	Below Expectations Much of the paper is copied from other sources, no original work is evident. Direct quotations exceed 20%. Fails to raise any important questions related to the topic assigned. Does not meet the criteria of the assignment.	Meets Minimal Expectations Direct quotations are between 10-15%. Raises questions related to the topic, but may not provide reader with adequate evidence for why these additional questions should be considered.	Proficient, Exceeds Expectations Direct quotations are between 5-10%. Raises important questions relevant to the assigned topic, and answers them with evidence from professional sources.	Exemplary, Excellent Less than 5% direct quotations and they are only used to raise important questions relevant to the assigned topic and clearly make a point.
Proper Grammar 10 % All assignments are expected to meet minimum standards for proper English. This means that grammar, mechanics, punctuation, spelling and sentence structure should all be checked carefully by the student prior to submission. Spell check and grammar check are useful, but will not catch everything. Does the student use resources available to ensure grammatical and structural accuracy of the paper?	Below Expectations Writing mechanicsword usage, grammar and spelling contain many errors that do effect the paper's content.	Meets Minimal Expectations Multiple errors, but they do not substantially distract from the content.	Proficient, Exceeds Expectations Writing mechanics, word usage, grammar and spelling contains few errors that mostly do not effect the paper's content.	Exemplary, Excellent Writing mechanics, word usage, grammar and spelling contain minimal errors that do not effect the paper's content.
Organization/Coherence 5 % transitions,cohesive devices,appropriate headings	Below Expectations Disjointed and incomprehensible thoughts and clauses. No organization.<BR> Paragraph transitions need improvement.	Meets Minimal Expectations Poorly synthesizes material, makes inappropriate connections to other topics, <BR> Ideas are fragmented so that it is hard to understand text. <BR> Poor or weak ability to express thoughts. Material is poorly organized.	Proficient, Exceeds Expectations The student can<BR> synthesize material, make appropriate connections to other topics, <BR> Mostly clear, concise so that the content is understandable. Material is fairly well organized.	Exemplary, Excellent The student expertly:<BR> synthesizes material, makes several connections between relevant topics. <BR> Ideas are sequenced and logical so that the content is easy to understand. <BR> Clear, concise Material is well organized.
Assignment Format/ Structure 10 %	Below Expectations cover page is missing, or missing essential information as date, course ID, student/ supervisor details. page numbers are missing in addition to several format errors.	Meets Minimal Expectations Include a cover pager with essential details with minor missing details.	Proficient, Exceeds Expectations Include a cover pager that has name, date, course ID, Uni logo, assignment name and title, Supervisor details, includes Headings, footnotes, and page designs, are all presented in a Proficient format.	Exemplary, Excellent Include a cover pager that has name, date, course ID, Uni logo, assignment name and title, Supervisor details, includes Headings, footnotes, and page designs, are all presented in a unique and pleasant format.
Writing Format APA 10 %	Below Expectations More than 5 APA format issues.	Meets Minimal Expectations More than 3 APA format issues	Proficient, Exceeds Expectations Minor APA format issues.	Exemplary, Excellent Follows APA format.
References 5 % In all assignments, students are expected to appropriate cite the sources of ideas, facts, and quotations using the American Psychological Association's (APA) Manual of Style. A minimum of 10 references must be used and the textbooks may not be used as sources. Does student demonstrate the proper use of citations and proper reference page?	Below Expectations No professional sources used or cited, and/or come from an unreliable source. Much of paper is copied from sources, no original work is evident. The references are not all from reliable sources, such as Wikipedia and 3 or fewer are peer reviewed.	Meets Minimal Expectations Use of professional sources without a thoughtful summary as to why the sources are relevant or how they enter into writer's discussion/critique. The references are not all from reliable sources, such as Wikipedia.	Proficient, Exceeds Expectations Excellent reliability of professional sources. Use of source information within the paper is effective and necessary. Has less that 10 references and more than half all not peer reviewed, but are reputable and reliable sources.	Exemplary, Excellent Excellent reliability of professional sources. Use of source information within the paper is effective and necessary. Follows APA format. Has 10 or more references with the majority being peer reviewed journals.

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric