Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Arthur Page Case Study Rubric Revised
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Arthur Page Case Study Rubric Revised
Nonverbal Communication Report Rubric
Crisis PR case study rubric to evaluate paper
Rubric Code:
PX2A6X4
By
DrJDeTore
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Communication
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Arthur Page Case Study Rubric
Outstanding
4 pts
Proficient
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Unsatisfactory
1 pts
Abstract
Outstanding
Abstract
A 50-to-100 word abstract must accompany each case entry as a separate text file. This abstract should
explain the basic content, organization, and direction of the case without revealing suggested
resolutions or actual outcomes.
Proficient
Between 50-100 words, explains the basic content and organization without revealing the outcome, but is not as concise as it could be.
Fair
Exceeds 100 words or is less than 50, brief and concise but reveals the results.
Unsatisfactory
Too long or too short, or missing, does not explain the case or basic organization, or reveals the outcome.
Formatting
Outstanding
Formatting follows the guidelines presented in examples including cover sheet/title page, running heads, abstract, subheads (Intro/Purpose, Hypothesis, Methods/Procedure, Results, Discussion, Conclusion and References). Entire report transitions smoothly between sections and is aesthetically pleasing.
Proficient
Minor formatting errors, with some awkward transitions or changes in writing style.
Fair
Multiple formatting errors, some sections have drastic changes in voice or style. Sections do not function as a cohesive report.
Unsatisfactory
No attempt made to follow formatting guidelines. Sections clearly written by different people, multiple changes in style and voice.
Significance of Topic & Issues
Outstanding
The significance of the business problem and of the critical issues identified in the entry (and how
it relates to corporate communications) is paramount.
Proficient
Topic is significant, business problem and critical issues are identified but how it relates to corporate communications is not always clear.
Fair
Topic is significant but issues are not always identified nor are the ties to corporate communications clear.
Unsatisfactory
Topic is poor or not significant and ties to corporate communication are not clear.
Facts
Outstanding
Facts surrounding the case are accurate.
Proficient
Facts surrounding the case are mostly accurate.
Fair
Facts are not always accurate.
Unsatisfactory
Unsubstantiated or inaccurate facts.
Decisions and Evaluations
Outstanding
Decisions and evaluations based on the case are clearly and effectively explained, with well-reasoned arguments and predictions based on strong, unbiased sources.
Proficient
Decisions and evaluations based on the case are presented and mostly explained, arguments generally support main idea, appropriate unbiased sources used.
Fair
Decisions and evaluations based on the case are not fully explained, but some effort is made to argue the main point. Some relevant sources included.
Unsatisfactory
Decisions and evaluations based on the case are disjointed and not explained, little effort is made to argue a specific point. No relevant or biased sources used.
Style, tone, quality of expression
Outstanding
Paper demonstrates
a sophisticated, professional-level style including concise and precise word choices, varied sentence structure, mature, unbiased tone indicative of a Fortune-500 business report.
Proficient
Paper demonstrates an advanced mostly professional-level style with concise and precise word choices, varied sentence structure, and a mostly mature and unbiased tone indicative of a professional business.
Fair
Paper demonstrates a fair command of language with mostly concise and precise word choices, some varied sentence structure, but varies in tone from a too-casual to business tone that may sometimes be inappropriate for business.
Unsatisfactory
Paper has some problems with style, uses rudimentary words in imprecise words, too verbose in spots, and an inappropriate tone for business.
Historical Overview
Outstanding
Concise but thorough
Proficient
Concise but missing some important dates
Fair
Sketchy or incomplete
Unsatisfactory
Missing
Timeline
Outstanding
Thorough and well-organized
Proficient
Most events listed and organized chronologically
Fair
Missing some events, not listed chronologically
Unsatisfactory
Missing entirely
Data/Financials
Outstanding
Data is included in a useful, graphical format. Analysis of the data is clear and properly explains the relationship between the incident and the overall financial effect (result).
Proficient
Financial data is included, but format is not ideal. Some analysis completed, but the reason for correlation is not presented. Conclusions loosely based on facts and data.
Fair
Some data included in confusing format which detracts from the purpose of the report. Analysis is incorrect or missing vital support from sources, data, or logical reasoning.
Unsatisfactory
No financial data included. Poor conclusions drawn with little evidence or support.
Bias/Fairness
Outstanding
Unbiased and balanced.
Proficient
Unbiased but not always balanced.
Fair
Biased tone and not always balanced.
Unsatisfactory
Less than one page, compares hypothesis with results but does not have sufficient research
References
Outstanding
At least five scholarly sources included, frequently and effectively used throughout the paper to support the hypothesis and the conclusions.
Proficient
Fewer than five scholarly sources cited. Sources somewhat effectively used to support the hypothesis and the conclusions of the report.
Fair
Sources cited, but few are scholarly. They are infrequently or ineffectively used in the report.
Unsatisfactory
Few or no scholarly sources, with no effort made to integrate them into the hypothesis or the conclusion of the report.
Length
Outstanding
Between 6-12 pages
Proficient
Fair
Unsatisfactory
Less than 6 pages or more than 15 pages
Grammar/Spelling
Outstanding
No grammar or spelling errors exist.
Proficient
Minor errors in grammar or spelling.
Fair
Grammar or spelling errors are frequent enough to distract the reader and detract from the purpose of the report.
Unsatisfactory
Numerous errors with no effort made to proofread.
Keywords:
Case Study Communication
Subjects:
Communication
Computers
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Communication rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.