Skip to main content
iRubric: Leadership Effectiveness Action Plan (LEAP) rubric

iRubric: Leadership Effectiveness Action Plan (LEAP) rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Leadership Effectiveness Action Plan (LEAP) 
Personal Leadership Development Plan Project
This rubric is used for a graduate course in Leadership in Technology
Rubric Code: P239X49
By gailt182
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Business  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Leadership Effectiveness
Leadership Effectiveness Action Plan
  Poor

(N/A)

Fair

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Students' Course Learning
10 pts

Provides additional insight into what each student has learned from the course.
Poor

-Little to no insight of what was learned from this course as
it relates to goals and leadership components.
Fair

-Some insight of what was learned from this course as it
relates to goals and leadership components, but
additional development would be needed.
Good

-Thorough insight of what was learned from this course as
it relates to goals and leadership components, to include
additional development and or self-exploration.
Self Analysis
10 pts

as compared to the personal goals
Poor

-May mention some strengths and weaknesses, but there
is nothing further discussed or there is no comparison to
personal goals.
-Does not list or describe or any core values.
-Did not discuss what others think of them.
Fair

-Analyzes ones own strengths and weaknesses, but may
not contain additional development and self-exploration
or comparison to personal goals.
-Described at least 1 - 3 core values; could have used
more details.
- Discussed what others think of them as either a person
but not a leader or vice versa.
Good

-Effectively analyzes own strengths and weaknesses. This
includes additional development and self-exploration of
each key leadership component and comparison of
personal goals.
- Identify your core values and the importance of following
them.
-Discuss what others think of you as a person and a
leader.
Leadership Analysis
10 pts

A clear description of the various leadership approaches comparing to your core values.
Poor

- Does not identify any self- assessments.
Fair

-Described 1-2 assessments without much detail.
Good

-Discuss all self-assessments that you completed this
semester (MBTI, OCEAN, ROTC, etc) Were they on
target in helping you define your leadership skills?
Personal and Leadership Goals
10 pts

Personal and Leadership Development Goals
Poor

-Brief discussion, or no discussion, of some personal
development goals.
- Little additional development or insight. Did not set any
goals or specify any resources or timeline.
Fair

-Discussion of personal goals may or may not include both
life and leadership development goals.
- May not have additional insight.
- Some aspect of ethical leadership discussed.
- Set 1-3 goals.
- Missing either the assistance or the timeline.
Good

-Discussion personal and leadership development
goals; This development will be well-rounded and
include additional insight.
-Some aspect of ethical leadership discussed and
integrated into the development plan.
-Set 3-5 goals to reach your leadership development.
This should include what actions you are
going to set forth to complete these goals.
-What resources you are going to use to assist and a
timeline.
Organization & Structure
5 pts

Enter criteria description
Poor

-Organization and structure detract from the message of
the writer.
-Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
Fair

- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow.<BR>
- Paragraph transitions need improvement.-
Good

- Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions are present and logical and
maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.
Formatting
5 pts

Enter criteria description
Poor

- Paper lacks many elements of correct formatting.
- Paper is inadequate/ excessive in length.
- APA style is not used.
Fair

- Paper follows most guidelines.
- Paper is over/under word length.
- APA Style is used somewhat throughout.
Good

- Paper follows designated guidelines.
- Paper is the appropriate length as described for the
assignment.
- APA Style is used consistently throughout.
Grammar, Punctuation, & Spelling
5 pts

Poor

- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and
spelling errors.
- Language used jargon or conversational tone.
Fair

- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and
spelling errors.
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon
or conversational tone.
Good

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed;
spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display
consistently strong, varied structure.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16