iRubric: "Flowers for Algernon" Mazes rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

"Flowers for Algernon" Mazes rubric

"Flowers for Algernon" Word Cloud rubric

Create a set of five different 3-D mazes, similar to the ones used by Charlie when he raced Algernon. Administer the mazes to four different people and time how quickly they finish each maze. Create a comparative graph of each person's times. Create a portfolio that inlcudes the mazes, your comparative graphs, and a summarization of your findings.

Rubric Code: NXW7X63

By torigorosave

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

Mazes
	Excellent Poor 4 pts	Good Fair 3 pts	Fair Good 2 pts	Poor Excellent 1 pts
Mazes	Excellent Five mazes are used. The mazes range in difficulty level from simple to complex. At least four different people are used in the experiment.	Good Five mazes are used. The mazes range little in difficulty level from simple to complex. Three or four different people are used in the experiment.	Fair Three to five mazes are used. The mazes are all of a similar difficulty level. Two or three different people are used in the experiment.	Poor Fewer than there mazes are used. The mazes are all of similar difficulty level. One or two different people are used in the experiment, OR experiment is incomplete.
Maze Race Results / Graph	Excellent Maze race results are correctly and neatly graphed so it is easy to distinguish results by person racing and maze raced.	Good Maze race results are correctly graphed so it is mostly easy to distinguish results by person and maze.	Fair Maze race results are confusing or sloppily graphed so it is difficult to distinguish results by person and maze.	Poor Maze race results are incomplete.
Analysis (Findings Summary)	Excellent Summary of findings is complete and fully analyzes the results based on multiple factors (difficulty of maze, age, time, time of day, etc).	Good Summary of findings is complete and analyzes the results based on limited factors.	Fair Summary of findings is mostly complete but little to no attempt is made to analyze the results.	Poor Summary of findings is incomplete.
Conventions/Word Choice	Excellent Word choice demonstrates excellent knowledge of topic. Zero convention errors.	Good Word choice demonstrates good knowledge of topic. One or two convention errors.	Fair Word choice demonstrates fair knowledge of topic. Three or four convention errors.	Poor Word choice demonstrates limited knowledge of topic. Five or more convention errors.