Skip to main content

iRubric: Lab Report rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Lab Report 
This will assist in the qualitative grading of laboratory reports
Rubric Code: NBWAA3
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Biology  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Lab Report
Enter rubric description
  Poor

4 pts

Fair

6 pts

good

8 pts

excellent

10 pts

Introduction

Poor

Two or less of the "excellent" conditions met.
Fair

Three of the "excellent" conditions met.
good

Four of the five "excellent" conditions met.
excellent

1. Clearly defined purpose or hypothesis.
2. Background information uses sources.
3. Sources cited using the Name-Year format.
4. Good use of sentence structure. 5. Defines intended outcomes of the lab.
Methods

Poor

Two or less of the "excellent" conditions met.
Fair

Three of the "excellent" conditions met.
good

Four of the five "excellent" conditions met.
excellent

1. Methodology described properly without too many unnecessary details.
2. Past tense used throughout.
3. No use of "we" and "I".
4. Id experimental and control groups appropriately in body of text.
5. Written in paragraph form. Materials incorporated in text.
Results

Poor

Two or less of the "excellent" conditions met.
Fair

Three of the "excellent" conditions met.
good

Four of the five "excellent" conditions met..
excellent

1. Data is well labeled and presented in a logical manner (data table if necessary).
2. The measurements have units.
3. Tables and graphs are properly labeled and titled.
4. Conclusions for each table and graph are stated in words with a reference to the figure at end of sentences in parenthesis.
5. Past tense used throughout.
Discussion

Poor

Two or less of the "excellent" conditions met.
Fair

Three of the "excellent" conditions met.
good

Four of the five "excellent" conditions met.
excellent

1. Conclusions are supported by the data and reference the purpose/ hypothesis of the lab.
2. Data was analyzed and explanations were given to what was observed.
3. Contradictions and errors were discussed and possible reasons.
4. Format as outlined in pg. 104 Section 6.9 of Hoffman (2013) followed.
5. Last paragraph summarizes the study and new experiments/ques-tions are suggested.
Literature Cited

Poor

Two or less of the "excellent" conditions met.
Fair

Three of the four "excellent conditions" met.
good

.
excellent

1. Name-Year system of citations followed.
Examples are shown on pgs. 12-16 and pg.144 of Hoffmann, 2013.
2. In the text, the Name-Year system of citation was used at the end of the sentence or paragraph.
3. All sources were referenced at least once in the text.
4. Lab report has a minimum of 3 references with at least 1 being a primary source.



Keywords:
  • Lab report 101


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n58