iRubric: Oral Team Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Oral Team Presentation

This rubric will be used to evaluate students' teaching ability while delivering a 15-20 minute presentation of a prepared lesson plan on a provided topic.

Rubric Code: N3B466

By Tapiasclass

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: (none)

Oral Presentation
	Poor 65 pts	Fair 75 pts	Good 85 pts	Excellent 100 pts
Teaching Content 40 %	Poor The teaching lesson is very difficult to follow. It is difficult to grasp the the content in the lesson taught. There appears to be little or no organization or preparation.	Fair There is little demonstrated organization of the lesson taught There are parts of the lesson that are clear and easy to follow. Improvement could be made with more preparation.	Good The order of the lesson was easy to follow. The presenters were well organized in their thought pattern. The presenter was well prepared.	Excellent There was a preview of main objectives of the lesson. The presenters were well prepared. The speaker presented in a clear confident manner The presentation followed a very well prepared lesson plan.
Verbal communication skills 20 %	Poor The presenters were unable to communicate effectively in English due to a limited vocabulary. The presenters had many distracting speech transitions. The presenters had poor projection. The presenters had an inappropriate rate of delivery.	Fair The presenters had trouble communicating effectively in English due to a limited vocabulary. The presenters had several distracting speech transitions. The presenters had poor elocution. The presenters did not manage time well. The presenters read most of the information rather than explain it to the audience	Good The presenters had some problems in communicating effectively in English. The presenters had few speech transitions. The presenters projected their voice well. The presenters managed time well.	Excellent The presenters was able to communicate effectively in English. The presenters had no distracting transitions. The volume of the presenters was appropriate. The rate of delivery was appropriate. Time was managed well.
Non-verbal communication skills 20 %	Poor Presenters had many distracting mannerisms. Presenters made poor eye contact with the audience. Posture and placement were poor.	Fair The presenters had several distracting mannerisms. Used hand gestures excessively. Moved around too much or too little.	Good The presenters had few distracting mannerisms. Used hand gestures effectively. Appropriate amount of eye contact with the audience.	Excellent The presenters had no distracting mannerisms. Presenters had excellent command of stage. Presenters utilized gestures and facial expressions well.
Use of Visuals 10 %	Poor No presentation was used AND without the visuals, it was difficult to follow the talk.	Fair Presentation was disjointed with many typos and/or spelling error.	Good Presentation was cohesive but contained typos and/or spelling errors. Slides were crowded with text.	Excellent Presentation was cohesive with no typos and/or spelling errors. Slides were easy to read and follow.
Intros, Transitions and Conclusion 10 %	Poor No signs of preparation and practice in the team. Difficult transitions between team members. Disorganized hand-offs. No compelling intro or conclusion.	Fair Evidence of little preparation and practice in team. Order was followed but jumped around. Intro or conclusion was included but not both.	Good Evidence of good preparation and practice. Strong intro or conclusion but not both. Team members were generally prepared for their parts.	Excellent Strong evidence of good preparation and practice. Both intro and conclusions were compelling. Transitions between speakers were seamless.

Keywords:

team, presentation

Subjects:

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric