Skip to main content
iRubric: Character Analysis Essay rubric

iRubric: Character Analysis Essay rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Character Analysis Essay 
Rubric for grading a character analysis essay
Rubric Code: N223CC7
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Character Analysis Essay
  Excellent

10 pts

Good

8 pts

Fair

6 pts

Poor

4 pts

Thesis Statement

Excellent

Clear and strong thesis statement. The thesis statement previews the three main points which will be analyzed in the essay. The thesis statement makes an assertion about how these qualities led to the demise of the character --or--how these qualities were used to complicate the action of the play.
Good

Thesis statement is clear but could be a little stronger. The thesis statment previews three of the main points which will be analyzed in the essay.
Fair

Thesis statement is somewhat unclear and is stated as a fact. Thesis statement only mentions two of the character's qualities that will be analyzed in the essay.
Poor

Thesis statement is very unclear. Only mentions one qualitiy of the character that is going to be analyzed, or does not mention one at all.
Evidence

Excellent

Students includes at least three strong pieces of evidence from the text, including direct quotes, to support the assertion.
Good

Student uses three pieces of evidence from the text to support the assertion. Evidence could be a little stronger.
Fair

Student only uses two pieces of evidence from the text to support the assertion. May only include one or two direct quotes, and these may be somewhat unrelated to the assertion.
Poor

Student only includes one piece of evidence to support the assertion. No direct quotes from the text. Evidence does not clearly support the assertion.
Conclusion

Excellent

Student restates his/her assertion in the conclusion. Provides strong summary of the key points of the essay. Ends with statement about character.
Good

Student restates his/her assertion in the conclusion. Provides vague summary of the key points of the essay. Ends with statement about the character.
Fair

Student partially restates assertion in the conclusion. Provides very brief summary of the key points of the essay. Makes an attempt at ending the essay with a statement about the character.
Poor

Student did not restate the assertion in the conclusion. Little summary of the key points of the essay. Does not endd with statement about the character analyzed.
Organization

Excellent

Student included an introduction (containing strong attention-getting material, the title and author, and the thesis statement), a body paragraph for each quality analyzed, and a conclusion. Student cites source of all direct quotations by creating in-text citations using MLA formatting guidelines .
Good

Student included an introduction (containing attention-getting material, the title and author, and the thesis statement), a body paragraph for each quality analyzed, and a conclusion. Student cites source of some quotations by creating in-text citations using ML A formatting guidelines, but may have one formatting error.
Fair

Student is missing pertinent information (introduction, body, conclusion). Errors in organization may make it difficult to read essay. An attempt to use in-text citations for direct quotations has been made, but the citations do not follow MLA format.
Poor

Student is missing several parts of the essay. May have written the essay as one long paragraph or as a list. Organization errors make the essay difficult to read. In-text citations have not been used to cite the source of direct quotations.
Grammar and Conventions

Excellent

There are no grammatical or mechanical errors in the essay.
Good

There are 1 or 2 errors in the essay, but not enough to be distracting to the reader.
Fair

There are 3 - 4 errors in the essay which are a slight distraction to the writer.
Poor

There are more than 5 errors in the essay which cause the reader to be distracted.



Keywords:
  • character analysis, English

Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98