iRubric: Argumentative Essay Rubric-WC only, no in-text required

Well-developed intro engages the reader & creates interest. Thesis clearly states a significant and compelling position.
Conclusion revisits the thesis in a new way and applies the writer's position universally.

Introduction creates interest and contains background information. Thesis is stated or inferred. Writer summarizes thesis and key points with some commentary.

Introduction is adequate, but thesis is vague. Conclusion mirrors intro too closely, with little or no new commentary.

Background details are a random collection of information, are unclear, and may be loosely related to the topic. Thesis/position is vague or not stated. Conclusion does not re-visit the thesis or summarize key point(s).

Well-developed points directly support the writer's thesis / position. Supporting examples are concrete & detailed. Commentary is logical and well-thought out. Evidence from sources is smoothly & logically integrated into essay. A counterargument is present.

Most argumentative points are related to the thesis. Commentary is present. Evidence is integrated into text. There is an attempt at a counterargument.

Main points lack sufficient details and support. Commentary is superficial. The 2 parts to a counter-argument are not present.

Most argumentative points are poorly developed. Commentary is not present. Little or no source material is used. No counterargument.

Punctuation, spelling, & capitalization are accurate with few or no errors.

Punctuation, spelling, & capitalization are generally accurate, with some minor errors.

There are several errors in punctuation, spelling, & capitalization including run-ons and fragments.

There are numerous grammar error that detract from the message and raise questions on writer's credibility especially fragments and run-ons.
A writing tutor is strongly recommended