Skip to main content

iRubric: FLO286 Floral Design Analysis Final rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
FLO286 Floral Design Analysis Final 
The following rubric will be used to grade your Floral Design Analysis Final
Rubric Code: M9W59W
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Floral Design Analysis Final
100 %
  Excellent

100 pts

Good

90 pts

Fair

80 pts

Poor

70 pts

Total Points

(N/A)

Introduction

10%

Excellent

Introduction explains author's selection of the floral design in a thoughtful manner, explaining how the author found the selection and what caused him to want to consider it further.
Good

Introduction explains author's selection of the floral design and what caused him to consider it further.
Fair

Introduction mentions where the author came across the floral design but does not put much effort into explaining what attracted him to pursue it further in the critique.
Poor

Introduction not present or does not explain how the author selected the floral design or why they chose to write about it.
Total Points
Description and Steps

30%

Excellent

Author thoroughly and thoughtfully explains the details of insertion and steps involved in design. Discusses the size , medium used, process used, the significant elements used in the work: line, shape, space, color, texture, form and value. Author shows his strong understanding of the elements through the details chosen to support the description.
Good

Author explains the details of insertion and steps involved in design. Discusses most of the following: size , medium used, process used, object and significant elements used in the work: line, shape, space, color, texture, form and value. All observations are supported by details in the floral design.
Fair

Author somewhat explains the details of insertion and steps involved in design. Discusses some of the following: size, medium used, process used, object and significant elements used in the work: line, shape, space, color, texture, form and value.
Poor

Author does not explains the details of insertion and steps involved in design. Makes a weak attempt to describe the floral design and does not support the description with details from the floral design.
Total Points
Analysis

20%

Excellent

Author answers the question: How is the work organized? Thoroughly discusses the principles of floral design: balance, movement, pattern, rhythm, emphasis, contrast, unity and variety. and uses details from the floral design to show a strong understanding of the principles of floral design. Discusses the aesthetic theory of the work.
Good

Author answers the question: How is the work organized? Discusses the principles of floral design: balance, movement, pattern, rhythm, emphasis, contrast, unity and variety. and how they were used in the composition with details from the artwork to support his observations.
Fair

Author somewhat answers the question: How is the work organized? Discusses a few of the principles of art: balance, movement, pattern, rhythm, emphasis, contrast, unity and variety. Author uses a few details from the artwork to support his observations.
Poor

Author does not answer the question: Where is the focal point, shape, eye flow and color combination? Makes a weak effort to mention the principles of art: Author does not use details from the artwork to support his observations.
Total Points
Interpretation

20%

Excellent

Author thoughtfully and thoroughly answers: Where is the focal point, shape, eye flow and color combinations? The interpretation is based on visual facts and clues collected during the first two steps, and context and purpose are called upon to determine meaning.
Good

Author answers: Where is the focal point, shape, eye flow and color combination? The interpretation is based on some visual facts and clues collected during the first two steps, and context and purpose might be called upon to determine meaning.
Fair

Author somewhat answers: Where is the focal point, shape, eye flow and color combination? The interpretation is based on a few visual facts and clues collected during the first two steps, and context or purposes might not be called upon to determine meaning.
Poor

Author does not answer: What is the artist trying to communicate? The interpretation is not supported by visual facts and clues or context or purposes.
Total Points
Judgment

10%

Excellent

The author thoughtfully and thoroughly answers: What would I have done differently? They answer it on a personal level (do you like it) and on an aesthetic level (does it have artistic merit). The author pulls from the first three steps to make an intelligent judgment.
Good

The author answers: What would I have done differently? They answer it on a personal level (do you like it) and on an aesthetic level (does it have artistic merit). The author pulls from the first three steps to make an intelligent judgment.
Fair

The author somewhat answers: What would I have done differently? They answer it on either a personal level (do you like it) or on an aesthetic level (does it have artistic merit). The author does not pull from the first three steps to make a judgment.
Poor

The author does not answer:What would I have done differently? The judgment is not supported by the first three steps of analysis nor details from the artwork.
Total Points
Style

5%

Excellent

Writing is smooth, skillful, and coherent. Sentences are strong and expressive with varied structure. Consistent and appropriate tone and word choice is used throughout the essay.
Good

Writing is clear and sentences have varied structure. There is consistent tone and word choice is appropriate.
Fair

Writing is clear, but sentences may lack variety. The tone is inconsistent and word choice, while adequate, could be better.
Poor

Writing is confusing and hard to follow. Contains fragments and/or run-on sentences. The tone and purpose is inconsistent and difficult to determine.
Total Points
Mechanics

5%

Excellent

No errors in punctuation, spelling, grammar, or capitalization. .
Good

A few minor errors in punctuation, spelling, grammar, or capitalization, but they do not detract from the overall meaning and effectiveness of the essay.
Fair

A few errors in punctuation, grammar, spelling, and capitalization that. while distracting, the meaning and intent of the essay can still be discerned.
Poor

Distracting and major errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization. there are more than one missing step of criticism, intro or conclusion and less than one page of body.
Total Points



Keywords:
  • floral, critique, analysis, principals, elements


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n58