iRubric: FLO286 Floral Design Analysis Final rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

FLO286 Floral Design Analysis Final

Weekly Art Critique

The following rubric will be used to grade your Floral Design Analysis Final

Rubric Code: M9W59W

By bloominsuz

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Floral Design Analysis Final 100 %
	Excellent 100 pts	Good 90 pts	Fair 80 pts	Poor 70 pts	Total Points (N/A)
Introduction 10%	Excellent Introduction explains author's selection of the floral design in a thoughtful manner, explaining how the author found the selection and what caused him to want to consider it further.	Good Introduction explains author's selection of the floral design and what caused him to consider it further.	Fair Introduction mentions where the author came across the floral design but does not put much effort into explaining what attracted him to pursue it further in the critique.	Poor Introduction not present or does not explain how the author selected the floral design or why they chose to write about it.	Total Points
Description and Steps 30%	Excellent Author thoroughly and thoughtfully explains the details of insertion and steps involved in design. Discusses the size , medium used, process used, the significant elements used in the work: line, shape, space, color, texture, form and value. Author shows his strong understanding of the elements through the details chosen to support the description.	Good Author explains the details of insertion and steps involved in design. Discusses most of the following: size , medium used, process used, object and significant elements used in the work: line, shape, space, color, texture, form and value. All observations are supported by details in the floral design.	Fair Author somewhat explains the details of insertion and steps involved in design. Discusses some of the following: size, medium used, process used, object and significant elements used in the work: line, shape, space, color, texture, form and value.	Poor Author does not explains the details of insertion and steps involved in design. Makes a weak attempt to describe the floral design and does not support the description with details from the floral design.	Total Points
Analysis 20%	Excellent Author answers the question: How is the work organized? Thoroughly discusses the principles of floral design: balance, movement, pattern, rhythm, emphasis, contrast, unity and variety. and uses details from the floral design to show a strong understanding of the principles of floral design. Discusses the aesthetic theory of the work.	Good Author answers the question: How is the work organized? Discusses the principles of floral design: balance, movement, pattern, rhythm, emphasis, contrast, unity and variety. and how they were used in the composition with details from the artwork to support his observations.	Fair Author somewhat answers the question: How is the work organized? Discusses a few of the principles of art: balance, movement, pattern, rhythm, emphasis, contrast, unity and variety. Author uses a few details from the artwork to support his observations.	Poor Author does not answer the question: Where is the focal point, shape, eye flow and color combination? Makes a weak effort to mention the principles of art: Author does not use details from the artwork to support his observations.	Total Points
Interpretation 20%	Excellent Author thoughtfully and thoroughly answers: Where is the focal point, shape, eye flow and color combinations? The interpretation is based on visual facts and clues collected during the first two steps, and context and purpose are called upon to determine meaning.	Good Author answers: Where is the focal point, shape, eye flow and color combination? The interpretation is based on some visual facts and clues collected during the first two steps, and context and purpose might be called upon to determine meaning.	Fair Author somewhat answers: Where is the focal point, shape, eye flow and color combination? The interpretation is based on a few visual facts and clues collected during the first two steps, and context or purposes might not be called upon to determine meaning.	Poor Author does not answer: What is the artist trying to communicate? The interpretation is not supported by visual facts and clues or context or purposes.	Total Points
Judgment 10%	Excellent The author thoughtfully and thoroughly answers: What would I have done differently? They answer it on a personal level (do you like it) and on an aesthetic level (does it have artistic merit). The author pulls from the first three steps to make an intelligent judgment.	Good The author answers: What would I have done differently? They answer it on a personal level (do you like it) and on an aesthetic level (does it have artistic merit). The author pulls from the first three steps to make an intelligent judgment.	Fair The author somewhat answers: What would I have done differently? They answer it on either a personal level (do you like it) or on an aesthetic level (does it have artistic merit). The author does not pull from the first three steps to make a judgment.	Poor The author does not answer:What would I have done differently? The judgment is not supported by the first three steps of analysis nor details from the artwork.	Total Points
Style 5%	Excellent Writing is smooth, skillful, and coherent. Sentences are strong and expressive with varied structure. Consistent and appropriate tone and word choice is used throughout the essay.	Good Writing is clear and sentences have varied structure. There is consistent tone and word choice is appropriate.	Fair Writing is clear, but sentences may lack variety. The tone is inconsistent and word choice, while adequate, could be better.	Poor Writing is confusing and hard to follow. Contains fragments and/or run-on sentences. The tone and purpose is inconsistent and difficult to determine.	Total Points
Mechanics 5%	Excellent No errors in punctuation, spelling, grammar, or capitalization. .	Good A few minor errors in punctuation, spelling, grammar, or capitalization, but they do not detract from the overall meaning and effectiveness of the essay.	Fair A few errors in punctuation, grammar, spelling, and capitalization that. while distracting, the meaning and intent of the essay can still be discerned.	Poor Distracting and major errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization. there are more than one missing step of criticism, intro or conclusion and less than one page of body.	Total Points

Keywords:

floral, critique, analysis, principals, elements

Subjects:

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric