- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Mock Debate performance rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Mock Debate performance Mock Debate performance Teams will demonstrate the ability to differentiate between theme positions provided as part of the problem solving process for a given scenario. (Debate-style team activity) the students would also defend their own group according to the scenario given to them. Rubric Code: LXB836B By Gustyp Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

mock debate
	Very Good 5 pts	Good 3 pts	Poor 1 pts
Problem solving	Very Good EXCEEDS<BR> <BR> In great detail, analyzes topic to solve problem(s).	Good MEETS<BR> <BR> Analyzes topic to solve problem(s).	Poor DOES NOT MEET<BR> <BR> Does NOT analyze topic to solve problem(s).
Knowledge of Comprehension	Very Good EXCEEDS<BR> <BR> Has good grasp of topic/concept. No extra help needed at this point.	Good MEETS<BR> <BR> Understands how to address the topic/content but still requires some extra help.	Poor DOES NOT MEET<BR> <BR> Does not know how to address the given topic. Extra help needed.
Critical Analysis	Very Good EXCEEDS<BR> <BR> Student demonstrates a strong ability to critically question the validity and reliability of information presented as fact(s).	Good MEETS<BR> <BR> Student demonstrates an adequate ability to critically question the validity and reliability of information presented as fact(s).	Poor DOES NOT MEET<BR> <BR> Student accepts all information as fact. Student does NOT question the validity and reliability of information presented as fact(s).
Participation in Debate	Very Good EXCEEDS<BR> <BR> Shows active listening, asks and answers questions during discussion.	Good MEETS<BR> <BR> Appears to pay attention and does participate in the discussion.	Poor DOES NOT MEET<BR> <BR> Student does NOT show interest and does NOT participate in discussion.
Conclusion	Very Good EXCEEDS<BR> <BR> Team attempts to offer a conclusion by exhibiting a strong understanding of the facts. Includes 3 or more facts in the conclusion.	Good MEETS<BR> <BR> Team attempts to offer a conclusion, but does not have a strong understanding of the facts. Includes 1 or 2 facts in the conclusion.	Poor DOES NOT MEET<BR> <BR> No attempt is made to conclude the debate. No facts are mentioned.