Skip to main content
iRubric: Vlog Reflection - Economics rubric

iRubric: Vlog Reflection - Economics rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Vlog Reflection - Economics 
Students are to create a vlog that: a) reflects the course content learned; b) contains the communication model; c) discusses at least four communication theories; and d) explains the ethical implications and future uses of this new knowledge in their everyday lives.
Rubric Code: LXAC5X7
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Finance  
Type: Reflection  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Vlog Reflection
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Communication
20 pts

Excellent

Excellent communication skills. Student uses verbal and nonverbal communication and messaging effectively. Communication skills and interaction with camera are very strong.
Good

Good communication skills. Student uses verbal and nonverbal communication somewhat effectively. Communication skills and interaction with camera are good.
Fair

Verbal and nonverbal communication skills are weak and interaction with camera is ineffective.
Poor

Communication skills, verbal and nonverbal messages along with camera interaction are poor.
Content
25 pts

Excellent

The vlog contains an overview of what was learned this week. The definition of economics, how Real Median Income levels are an indicator that other economic cues are on track and a recap of your journal entry. Citations and examples were included as needed. Visual and graphic organizers were used to support your VLOG. Future uses of information were explained.
Good

The vlog contains part of an overview of what was learned this week. AT least 3 of the 4 topics were covered .The communication model and some theories were applied to content. Citations and examples were limited.
Fair

The vlog contains a minimal overview of what was learned this week. At least 2 of the 4 topics were included. The communication model and few theories were applied to content. Citations and examples were not included as needed.
Poor

The vlog had no overview of what was learned and did not contain models or theories. Significant work is needed to improve.
Content Format
15 pts

Excellent

The vlog contained an effective introduction, body, conclusion and transitions that adhered to public address theory.
Good

The introduction, body and conclusion were somewhat apparent but did not effectively demonstrate public address theory.Transitions were lacking.
Fair

Introduction, body, and conclusion were ineffective and transitions were limited or missing entirely.
Poor

Significant improvement needed. Vlog was missing the majority of this information altogether.
Depth of reflection
25 pts

Excellent

Clearly ties personal knowledge into the reflection. Draws the relationship between readings and shows critical thinking. Clear evidence of reasoned reflection and depth. Provides excellent support for claims.
Good

Good personal reflection with reasoning and insight. Support for claims is evident. Good use of critical thinking.
Fair

Little personal reflection given. Shows some evidence of reasoned reflection. Provides some support for claims. Very little critical thinking.
Poor

No personal reaction given. Did not relate information to what he/she learned. Did not support any claims, or show critical thinking.
Criteria
15 pts

Excellent

Assignment met time limit 3-5 minutes; was submitted at designated time; was edited as appropriate; included images if needed;was professional; adhered to best practices of vlogging.
Good

Assignment almost met time limit 5-6 minutes; was submitted shortly after designated time; was somewhat edited as appropriate; included some images if needed;was somewhat professional; adhered to some of the best practices of vlogging.
Fair

Assignment didn't meet time limit above 6 minutes; was submitted late; was not edited as appropriate; included no images if needed;was unprofessional; adhered to few of the best practices of vlogging.
Poor

Assignment failed to meet most criteria provided, was poor and in need of great improvement.



Keywords:
  • communication model, communication theories, ethics, and application vlog







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98