Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Interrelationship Between Science and History rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Interrelationship Between Science and History
Project and Presentation Rubric
This summative assessment is a prepared, purposeful presentation designed to increase knowledge, to foster understanding, or to promote change in the listeners' attitudes, values, beliefs, or behaviors.l Communication can take many forms - in this instance, students had the choice of: live presentation, written paper, filmed presentation, movie trailer, or a 3D display or other object. Basic posters were not an option.
Rubric Code:
LX7W8X3
By
kmburleson
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Chemistry
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Interrelationship Between Science
Exemplary
(N/A)
Proficient
(N/A)
Basic
(N/A)
Below Basic
(N/A)
Not Accceptable
(N/A)
Organization
25 pts
Exemplary
-Specific introduction and conclusion.
-Sequenced material within the body.
-Cohesive presentation content in time limit given
Proficient
-Specific introduction and conclusion.
-Some sequenced material within the body.
-Presentation content is organized and somewhat cohesive
Basic
-Specific introduction and conclusion
-Sequenced material within the body is inconsistent
-Presentation lacks organization and is not cohesive
Below Basic
-Specific introduction and conclusion missing
-No sequence in material
-Presentation is minimum and does not meet time criteria
Not Accceptable
No presentation/work turned in
Language
25 pts
Exemplary
-Enhances the effectiveness of the presentation
-Correct grammar
-Appropriate to audience and product type
Proficient
-Support the effectiveness of the presentation
-Correct grammar
-Appropriate to audience and product type
Basic
-Not interesting
-Partially support the effectiveness of the presentation
-Correct grammar<
-Appropriate to audience and product type
Below Basic
-Unclear
-Minimally support the effectiveness of the presentation
-Occasional mistakes in grammar<
-Appropriate to audience and product type
Not Accceptable
No presentation/work turned in
Delivery
25 pts
Exemplary
-Good posture
-Eye contact with the audience most of the time
-Appropriate gesture and expression
-Deliverance with confidence
If written - paper is formatted correctly , main idea convincing, and details that go beyond the obvious.
Conveys fresh, useful information and offers insight to complex ideas
Proper citations of material used by all
Proficient
-Good posture
-Frequent eye contact with the audience
-Appropriate gesture and expression
If written - paper is formatted correctly, develops main idea with generally accurate information, presents useful information that helps reader understand with logical reasoning
Proper citations of material used by all
Basic
-Intermittent good posture
-Occasional eye contact with the audience
-Appropriate gesture and expression
If written main idea with information that lacks specificity and relevance and may be inaccurate
Paper starts to develop supporting ideas but lacks some clarity or obvious logical connection
Citations are attempted by all but incorrect
Below Basic
-Poor posture
-Seldom eye contact with the audience
-Not enough or too much gesture and expression
If written paper is attempted to be formatted correctly
Attempts to develop or support the main idea but paper is limited, repetitive and too general. No logical connections or uses connections that are faulty.
No citations of sources for any
Not Accceptable
No presentation/work turned in
Content
25 pts
Exemplary
Student discuss the importance of information.
Student describes in detail about their findings
Students indicate what they have learned.
Proficient
Student changes investigation but does not say why.
Student outlines finding
Students show what they have learned.
Basic
Student changes investigation but does not say why.
Student misconceptions are still seen
Below Basic
Students do not discuss about the changes in their investigations
Students do not outline what they have learned
students still sound confused on this topic
Not Accceptable
No presentation/work
Keywords:
Oral communication, Central message, Delivery techniques, Supporting material, Language
Subjects:
Chemistry
English
(General)
Types:
Presentation
Assessment
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Chemistry rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.