iRubric: Interrelationship Between Science and History rubric

-Specific introduction and conclusion.
-Sequenced material within the body.
-Cohesive presentation content in time limit given

-Specific introduction and conclusion.
-Some sequenced material within the body.
-Presentation content is organized and somewhat cohesive

-Specific introduction and conclusion
-Sequenced material within the body is inconsistent
-Presentation lacks organization and is not cohesive

-Specific introduction and conclusion missing
-No sequence in material
-Presentation is minimum and does not meet time criteria

No presentation/work turned in

-Good posture
-Eye contact with the audience most of the time
-Appropriate gesture and expression
-Deliverance with confidence
If written - paper is formatted correctly , main idea convincing, and details that go beyond the obvious.
Conveys fresh, useful information and offers insight to complex ideas
Proper citations of material used by all

-Good posture
-Frequent eye contact with the audience
-Appropriate gesture and expression
If written - paper is formatted correctly, develops main idea with generally accurate information, presents useful information that helps reader understand with logical reasoning
Proper citations of material used by all

-Intermittent good posture
-Occasional eye contact with the audience
-Appropriate gesture and expression
If written main idea with information that lacks specificity and relevance and may be inaccurate
Paper starts to develop supporting ideas but lacks some clarity or obvious logical connection
Citations are attempted by all but incorrect

-Poor posture
-Seldom eye contact with the audience
-Not enough or too much gesture and expression
If written paper is attempted to be formatted correctly
Attempts to develop or support the main idea but paper is limited, repetitive and too general. No logical connections or uses connections that are faulty.
No citations of sources for any

No presentation/work turned in