iRubric: rubric for a collaborative wiki project

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

rubric for a collaborative wiki project

This rubric is designed for a collaborative wiki project. In the project, learners are expected to research a famous hispanic and write a biography . After completed, they set up their wiki pages, post their biography, and invite their peers to visit their website and post their comments.

Rubric Code: LX6CAA9

By mskwhite

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 6-8

Rubric for a collaborative Wiki pro
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Research skills	Poor Wiki and biography utilize fewer than 5 resources, which are cited on a works cited page.	Fair Wiki and biography utilize 5-6 resource, which are cited on a works cited page.	Good Wiki and biography utilize 7-8 resources, which are cited on a works cited page.	Excellent Wiki and biography utilize 9-10 resources, which are cited on a works cited page.
Writing skills	Poor Writing is not clear, their grammatical and vocabulary errors hinder comprehension.	Fair Writing is very clear, but there is some grammatical and vocabulary mistakes.	Good Writing is very clear, use appropriate grammar and words.	Excellent Writing is very clear. Strong word choice and sentence fluency. Each sentence is descriptive and detailed; use appropriate grammar and words.
Visuals	Poor Learners can incorporate images, but the images are not relevent to the topic. Wiki had three or less hyperlinks to reference resources.	Fair Learners can incorporate images, which is relevant to their topic, but quality of images is not good; not clear or bad angle. Wiki had 3 or less hyperlinks to reference resources.	Good Learners can incorporate images and 4 hyperlinks, which are relevant to their topic, and enhance comprehension of their readers.	Excellent Learners can incorporate images, sounds, videos and 5 hyperlinks, which are relevant to their topic and enhance comprehension of their readers.
Comment skills	Poor Learners cannot find out how to use comment functions in wiki, or did not respond to their peer's article.	Fair Learners can use comment functions in wiki, and respond to their peers. One suggestion for improvement is given.	Good Learners can use comment functions in wiki, and respond to their peers. 2 suggestions for improvement are given.	Excellent Learners can use comments functions in wiki, and respond to their peers. 3 or more suggestions for improvement are given.
Timelines	Poor Project turned in two or more days late.	Fair Project turned in one day late	Good Project turned in at the end of the day.	Excellent Project turned by the end of class.
Respect	Poor Lack of respect evident in group interaction and/or written comments.	Fair Evidence of respect given intermittently between group members and/or written comments.	Good Respect given to group members most of the time. Written comments are respectful most of the time.	Excellent Each member treat all team members' ideas/person with respect at all times. Written comments are always respectful.

Keywords:

Wiki project, collabotative, rubric, social science learners

Subjects:

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric