iRubric: Art Review. Power Point Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Art Review. Power Point Presentation

Art Review

The following rubric will be used to grade your art review.

Rubric Code: KXX5W2C

By sulemivelasquez

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: 9-12

Art Review
	Excellent (N/A)	Good (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Poor (N/A)
Introduction	Excellent Introduction explains student's selection of the artwork in a thoughtful manner, explaining how the author found the selection and what caused him to want to consider it further.	Good Introduction explains student selection of the artwork and what caused him to consider it further.	Fair Introduction mentions where the student came across the artwork but does not put much effort into explaining what attracted him to pursue it further in the critique.	Poor Introduction not present or does not explain how the student selected the artwork or why they chose to write about it.
Description	Excellent Student thoroughly and thoughtfully answers the question: What do I see? Discusses the size of the work, medium used, process used, the subject, object and all the significant elements used in the work: line, shape, space, color, texture, form and value. Author shows his strong understanding of the elements	Good Student answers the question: What do I see? Discusses most of the following: size of the work, medium used, process used, the subject, object and significant elements used in the work: line, shape, space, color, texture, form and value.	Fair Student somewhat answers the question: What do I see? Discusses some of the following: size of the work, medium used, process used, the subject, object and significant elements used in the work: line, shape, space, color, texture, form and value.	Poor Student does not answer the question: What do I see? Makes a weak attempt to describe the artwork and does not support the description with details from the artwork.
Analysis	Excellent Student answers the question: How is the work organized? Thoroughly discusses the principles of art: balance, movement, pattern, rhythm, emphasis, contrast, unity and variety. and uses details from the artwork to show a strong understanding of the principles of art.	Good Student answers the question: How is the work organized? Discusses the principles of art: balance, movement, pattern, rhythm, emphasis, contrast, unity and variety.	Fair Student somewhat answers the question: How is the work organized? Discusses a few of the principles of art: balance, movement, pattern, rhythm, emphasis, contrast, unity and variety.	Poor Student does not answer the question: How is the work organized? Makes a weak effort to mention the principles of art: Author does not use details from the artwork to support his observations.
Interpretation	Excellent Student thoughtfully and thoroughly answers: What is the artist trying to communicate? The interpretation is based on visual facts	Good Student answers: What is the artist trying to communicate? The interpretation is based on some visual facts	Fair Student somewhat answers: What is the artist trying to communicate? The interpretation is based on a few visual facts	Poor Student r does not answer: What is the artist trying to communicate? The interpretation is not supported by visual facts
Conclusion	Excellent Student concludes with an engaging and interesting point about his reaction to the art work.	Good Student concludes with an interesting point about his reaction to the art work.	Fair Student concludes with a somewhat interesting point about his reaction to the art work.	Poor Student does not conclude or concludes with a shallow reaction to the art work.
Style	Excellent Writing is smooth, skillful, and coherent. In French Sentences are strong and expressive with varied structure. Consistent and appropriate tone and word choice is used throughout the essay. Transitions are appropriate and add to the effectiveness of the essay.	Good Writing is clear and sentences have varied structure in French . There is consistent tone and word choice is appropriate with fairly good use of transitions to guide the reader.	Fair Writing is clear, but sentences may lack variety In French . The tone is inconsistent and word choice, while adequate, could be better. While transitions are present they do not add to the overall effectiveness of the essay.	Poor Writing is confusing and hard to follow. Contains fragments and/or run-on sentences. The tone and purpose is inconsistent and difficult to determine. Transitions are either missing or inappropriate.
Mechanics	Excellent No errors in punctuation, spelling, grammar, or capitalization. Works of art are italicized. More than 200 words. Total of Slides, picture , label, references and names	Good A few minor errors in punctuation, spelling, grammar, or capitalization, but they do not detract from the overall meaning and effectiveness of the essay. 200 words Total of Slides, pictures and label, references, names	Fair A few errors in punctuation, grammar, spelling, and capitalization that. while distracting, the meaning and intent of the essay can still be discerned. Less 200 words Low number of Slides, pictures and label, references, names	Poor Distracting and major errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization. No article in the presenttaion . absence of pictures, label, name, references

Keywords:

Oral Presentation

Subjects:

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric