Skip to main content
iRubric: Laboratory Rubric for Assessing Laboratory Reports

iRubric: Laboratory Rubric for Assessing Laboratory Reports

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Laboratory Rubric for Assessing Laboratory Reports 
.
Project-Based Learning Unit for Elementary-level Biology Course Author: Rahul Sharma Institution: Southern University and A&M College Course: SMED 715 - Science/Mathematics Curriculum I Instructor: Professor Nastassia N. Jones Semester: Fall 2018 Date: December 3, 2018
Rubric Code: KXC72A5
By nonenonenone
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Biology  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: K-5

Powered by iRubric Laboratory Rubric
By Rahul Sharma
  Unacceptable

1 pts

Acceptable

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Abstract/Summary

Unacceptable

Several major aspects of the experiment are missing, student displays a lack of understanding about how to write an abstract.
Acceptable

Abstract misses one or more major aspects of carrying out the experiment or the results.
Good

Abstract references most of the major aspects of the experiment, some minor details are missing.
Excellent

Abstract contains reference to all major aspects of carry ing out the experiment and the results, well-written.
Introduction

Unacceptable

Very little background information provided or information is incorrect.
Acceptable

Some introductory information, but missing some major points.
Good

Introduction is nearly complete, missing some minor points or information.
Excellent

Introduction is complete and well-written; provides all necessary background principles for the experiment.
Experimental Procedure

Unacceptable

Missing several important experimental details or not written in paragraph format.
Acceptable

Written in paragraph format, but still missing some important experimental details.
Good

Written in paragraph format, important experimental details are covered, some minor details are missing.
Excellent

Well-written in paragraph format, all experimental details are covered well
Results

Data, Figures, Graphs, Tables, etc.
Unacceptable

Figures, graphs, tables, etc. contain errors or are poorly constructed, have missing titles, captions or numbers, units are missing or incorrect, etc.
Acceptable

Most figures graphs, tables, etc. are OK, but some are still missing important or required features.
Good

All figures graphs, tables, etc. are correctly drawn/presented, but some have minor problems or could still be improved.
Excellent

All figures graphs, tables, etc. are correctly drawn/presented, are numbered, referred to and contain titles/captions.
Discussion

Unacceptable

Very incomplete or incorrect interpretation of trends and comparison of data indicating a lack of understanding of results.
Acceptable

Some of the results have been correctly interpreted and discussed; partial but incomplete understanding of results is still evident.
Good

Almost all of the results have been correctly interpreted and discussed, only minor improvements are needed.
Excellent

All important trends and data comparisons have been interpreted correctly and discussed, good understanding of results is conveyed.
Conclusions

Unacceptable

Conclusions missing or missing the important points
Acceptable

Conclusions regarding major points are drawn, but many are mis-stated, indicating a lack of understanding.
Good

All important conclusions have been drawn, could be better stated/presented.
Excellent

All important conclusions have been clearly made, student shows good understanding of experiment and results.
Spelling, Grammar, Structure

Unacceptable

Frequent grammar and/or spelling errors, writing style is rough and immature.
Acceptable

Occasional grammar and/or spelling errors, generally readable with some rough spots in writing style.
Good

Less than 3 grammar/spelling errors, generally readable with some rough spots in writing style.
Excellent

All grammar and spelling correct and very well written.
Appearance and Formatting

Unacceptable

Sections out of order, too much handwritten copy, sloppy formatting.
Acceptable

Sections in order, contains the minimum allowable amount of handwritten copy, formatting is rough but readable.
Good

All sections in order, formatting generally good but could still be improved.
Excellent

All sections in order, well-formatted, very readable.
References

Unacceptable

References missing, not formatted, and/or not credible sources
Acceptable

Included many important references, but not a complete list. Multiple errors in format and citations.
Good

Complete list of references included, with minor issues in formatting and/or citations.
Excellent

Complete list of references that are all properly formatted and referenced/cited in the text.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16