Skip to main content
iRubric: Final Paper (Historical Overview) rubric

iRubric: Final Paper (Historical Overview) rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Final Paper (Historical Overview) 
Cognitive Theory: Then Versus Now
Select three or more journal articles or book chapters to compare/contrast your topic historically to modern times in a written review. Use reputable sources (eg, peer reviewed scientific journals) written by psychologists: include 1 article at least 25 years old, and 1 article no more than 3 years old.
Rubric Code: KX56997
By HKamal4850
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Psychology  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Research Paper
  Needs Improvement

Does not meet the requirements. Perhaps rushed.

(N/A)

Good

Meets assignment requirements, but possibly talks around the point. Has been proofread, but could possibly use more editing.

(N/A)

Excellent

Meets highest expectations and is usually the result of thorough editing. Points are made clearly, convincingly, directly.APA format

(N/A)

Quality of Articles/chapters
3 pts

Needs Improvement

--Failed to cite journal sources.
--Source reliablility questionable.
--Some information relevant to project
--Information provided to support some elements of project.
--Surface research. No APA
Good

--Sources mostly reliable, with credit given.
--Most information relevant to project
--Sufficient information provided to support most elements of project
--Research of sufficient
depth.
Excellent

3 (or more) cited sources.
--Sources reliable and properly credited.
--1 source older than 25 years, 1 less than 3
--Content focuses on topic area assigned
--Writings referenced are academic and from reputable sources, such as APA journals
Content/analyses
7 pts

Needs Improvement

--Thesis too broad or narrow for length of paper.
--Merely providing information without analyzing, reflecting, or synthesizing it.
Good

--Thesis somewhat broad or narrow for length of project
--Analysis is sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity.
--Writer includes strengths and/or limitations but they are not fully developed
Excellent

--Thesis interesting, of appropriate breadth & length
--Support for project complex, complete, & in-depth.
--analytical and thoughtful
--Writer summarizes research articles effectively
--Writer includes strengths and limitations of topic assigned
APA Format
1 pts

Needs Improvement

--Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography/references
-- More than than 3 errors in format or punctuation.
Good

--All sources given credit in references
--1-2 errors in APA citation format
Excellent

--All sources given credit in both paper and references.
--No errors in APA citation format.
Quality of Writing
3 pts

Needs Improvement

-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.
-- Correct word choice.
--2 or more spelling errors.
--2 or more errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- 3 or more punctuation or capitalization errors.
Good

-- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate
-- Fairly effective word choice.
--No more than 2 spelling errors.
--Fewer than 2 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- Fewer than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Excellent

--Consistent and appropriate voice.
-- Sophisticated and precise word choice.
--No spelling errors.
--No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.
Length/Organization
1 pts

Needs Improvement

--Paper is less than 6 pages in length
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Good

--Paper is not quite 8 pages
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Excellent

--Paper 8-10 pages in length not including title and reference pages
--Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.



Keywords:
  • Research paper Review of Literature cognitive theory



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98