Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Cognitive Psychology Paper rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Cognitive Psychology Paper
Learning and Memory Paper
This paper discusses one of the topics covered in the ZAPS Cognition labs.
Rubric Code:
K235CC7
By
kmtrujilo
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Psychology
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Paper covering ZAPS lab topic
Excellent
20 pts
Good
15 pts
Needs Improvement
10 pts
Unsatisfactory
5 pts
Introduction and Explanation of Phenomenon
10 %
Excellent
The purpose of paper is clearly outlined.
Good
The purpose of paper is mostly clearly outlined.
Needs Improvement
The purpose of paper is not clear.
Unsatisfactory
The purpose of paper is not explained.
Content
60 %
Excellent
The phenomenon being covered is explained clearly. The original research on this phenomenon is explained clearly. Summarizes the current research and applications in this area clearly.
All content is relevant to the topic. Writer summarizes research using their own words, with no quotations.
Has 4-5 pages of content, not including the title or reference pages.
Good
The phenomenon being covered is explained mostly clearly. The original research on this phenomenon is explained but not always clearly. Summarizes the current research and applications in this area, but not always clearly, or research is not current.
Most content is relevant to the topic.
Uses direct quotations at times, rather than summarizing material.
Has 3-4 or more than 6 pages of content, not including the title or reference pages.
Needs Improvement
It is not clear that the writer understands the phenomenon being covered. The original research on this phenomenon is explained with errors.
Summarizes the current research and applications in this area, but not clearly and completely, and/or much of the information is outdated.
Some content is relevant to the topic, but much is not.
Uses direct quotations without explaining how they are relevant.
Has 2-3 pages of content, not including the title or reference page
Unsatisfactory
The phenomenon being covered is presented incorrectly. The original research on this phenomenon is not mentioned, or is outdated or irrelevant, or merely includes large blocks of direct quotations instead of summarizing.
Less than 2.5 pages, not including reference or title pages.
Use of outside sources.
10 %
Excellent
Sources are scholarly and properly cited.
Sources relate well to the topic.
Ideas from the sources are used effectively.
At least 5 scholarly sources (with one of the 5 being the textbook) are included.
Good
Sources mostly reliable and scholarly.
Sources are not always the best choice.
Ideas from the sources are mostly used effectively.
At least 3-4 scholarly sources (with one of the 5 being the textbook) are used.
Needs Improvement
Sources are not scholarly and reliability is questionable.
Sources don't relate well to the topic.
Ideas from the sources are not used effectively.
Two or fewer sources (with one of the 5 being the textbook) are used.
Unsatisfactory
Sources are unreliable.
Sources do not relate to the topic. Ideas from sources are not used effectively.
Grammar and Mechanics
10 %
Excellent
Consistent and appropriate writing style.
Ideas are clearly expressed
There are no grammatical errors.
There are no spelling errors.
Appropriate punctuation used.
Good
Mostly consistent and appropriate writing style
Ideas are fairly clearly expressed.
Fewer than 2 punctuation, or capitalization errors.
Adequate sentence structure.
Writing is mostly formal enough.
Needs Improvement
The writing is somewhat awkward and unclear.
The paper has poor sentence structure and transitions.
There are multiple punctuation and spelling errors.
There are capitalization errors.
Writing is too informal.
Unsatisfactory
Awkward and unclear writing.
More than 5 spelling errors.
More than 5 grammar errors.
More than 5 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Writing is much too informal
APA style citations and References
10 %
Excellent
Title Page is in APA style
Citations are in proper APA format.
References page is in APA style with no errors.
Margins of Paper are 1"
Good
Title Page is in APA style, with minor errors
Citations are mostly in APA format.
References page is in APA style with minor errors.
Margins of Paper are larger or smaller than 1"
Needs Improvement
Title Page is in not in APA style
Citations are not in proper APA format.
References page is not in APA or has many errors
Margins of Paper are much larger than 1"
Unsatisfactory
Title page is missing
Citations are missing
Reference page is missing.
Keywords:
Research paper - emphasis on Evidence Based Practice
Subjects:
English
Psychology
Education
Nursing
Types:
Project
Presentation
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.