Skip to main content
iRubric: Cognitive Psychology Paper rubric

iRubric: Cognitive Psychology Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Cognitive Psychology Paper 
This paper discusses one of the topics covered in the ZAPS Cognition labs.
Rubric Code: K235CC7
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Psychology  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Paper covering ZAPS lab topic
  Excellent

20 pts

Good

15 pts

Needs Improvement

10 pts

Unsatisfactory

5 pts

Introduction and Explanation of Phenomenon
10 %

Excellent

The purpose of paper is clearly outlined.
Good

The purpose of paper is mostly clearly outlined.
Needs Improvement

The purpose of paper is not clear.
Unsatisfactory

The purpose of paper is not explained.
Content
60 %

Excellent

The phenomenon being covered is explained clearly. The original research on this phenomenon is explained clearly. Summarizes the current research and applications in this area clearly.
All content is relevant to the topic. Writer summarizes research using their own words, with no quotations.
Has 4-5 pages of content, not including the title or reference pages.
Good

The phenomenon being covered is explained mostly clearly. The original research on this phenomenon is explained but not always clearly. Summarizes the current research and applications in this area, but not always clearly, or research is not current.
Most content is relevant to the topic.
Uses direct quotations at times, rather than summarizing material.
Has 3-4 or more than 6 pages of content, not including the title or reference pages.
Needs Improvement

It is not clear that the writer understands the phenomenon being covered. The original research on this phenomenon is explained with errors.
Summarizes the current research and applications in this area, but not clearly and completely, and/or much of the information is outdated.
Some content is relevant to the topic, but much is not.
Uses direct quotations without explaining how they are relevant.
Has 2-3 pages of content, not including the title or reference page
Unsatisfactory

The phenomenon being covered is presented incorrectly. The original research on this phenomenon is not mentioned, or is outdated or irrelevant, or merely includes large blocks of direct quotations instead of summarizing.
Less than 2.5 pages, not including reference or title pages.
Use of outside sources.
10 %

Excellent

Sources are scholarly and properly cited.
Sources relate well to the topic.
Ideas from the sources are used effectively.
At least 5 scholarly sources (with one of the 5 being the textbook) are included.
Good

Sources mostly reliable and scholarly.
Sources are not always the best choice.
Ideas from the sources are mostly used effectively.
At least 3-4 scholarly sources (with one of the 5 being the textbook) are used.
Needs Improvement

Sources are not scholarly and reliability is questionable.
Sources don't relate well to the topic.
Ideas from the sources are not used effectively.
Two or fewer sources (with one of the 5 being the textbook) are used.
Unsatisfactory

Sources are unreliable.
Sources do not relate to the topic. Ideas from sources are not used effectively.
Grammar and Mechanics
10 %

Excellent

Consistent and appropriate writing style.
Ideas are clearly expressed
There are no grammatical errors.
There are no spelling errors.
Appropriate punctuation used.
Good

Mostly consistent and appropriate writing style
Ideas are fairly clearly expressed.
Fewer than 2 punctuation, or capitalization errors.
Adequate sentence structure.
Writing is mostly formal enough.
Needs Improvement

The writing is somewhat awkward and unclear.
The paper has poor sentence structure and transitions.
There are multiple punctuation and spelling errors.
There are capitalization errors.
Writing is too informal.
Unsatisfactory

Awkward and unclear writing.
More than 5 spelling errors.
More than 5 grammar errors.
More than 5 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Writing is much too informal
APA style citations and References
10 %

Excellent

Title Page is in APA style

Citations are in proper APA format.

References page is in APA style with no errors.

Margins of Paper are 1"
Good

Title Page is in APA style, with minor errors

Citations are mostly in APA format.

References page is in APA style with minor errors.

Margins of Paper are larger or smaller than 1"
Needs Improvement

Title Page is in not in APA style

Citations are not in proper APA format.

References page is not in APA or has many errors

Margins of Paper are much larger than 1"
Unsatisfactory

Title page is missing

Citations are missing

Reference page is missing.



Keywords:
  • Research paper - emphasis on Evidence Based Practice







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98