Skip to main content
iRubric: Critique essay 2 rubric

iRubric: Critique essay 2 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Critique essay 2 
Critique essay two
Rubric Code: JXC3XX8
By sabrynac77
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Journalism  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Critique essay
  Poor

1 pts

Below average

2 pts

Average

3 pts

Above average

4 pts

Superior

5 pts

Introduction

Poor

No introduction.
Below average

An attempt at an introduction has been made but it does not follow conventional paragraph format.
Average

Introduction includes some of the purpose of the essay, but stronger one needed
Above average

The students has communicated the overall purpose of the article in a topic sentence and well-structured paragraph.
Superior

The student has clearly identified the overall purpose of the article in a well-conceived topic sentence, and provided an overview of what is to follow.
Definition

Poor

Student did not adequately define fake news or provide any examples.
Below average

Student adequately defined fake news, but did not provide examples
Average

Student adequately defined fake news and provided a couple examples but did not explain relevance
Above average

Student defined fake news well and provided a couple examples but did not explain relevance
Superior

Student clearly defined fake news and provided relevant examples that were explained well
Media literacy

Poor

Student identified almost no practical solutions to combat fake news for media and individuals.
Below average

Student identified a couple practical solutions to combat fake news for media and individuals.
Average

Student identified some practical solutions to combat fake news for media and individuals.
Above average

Student identified several practical solutions to combat fake news for media and individuals.
Superior

Student identified and analyzed several practical solutions to combat fake news for media and individuals.
Future of fake news

Poor

Did not predict or analyze future implications for fake news. used no examples to make argument.
Below average

Predicted and analyzed future implications for fake news. used no examples to make argument.
Average

Somewhat predicted and analyzed future implications for fake news. used examples to make argument.
Above average

Predicted and analyzed future implications for fake news. used some examples to make argument.
Superior

Predicted and analyzed future implications for fake news. used many examples to make argument.
Research

Poor

No sources included.
Below average

Student included 2 sources
Average

Student included 3 sources; included outside research
Above average

Student included 4-5 or more outside sources to support thesis; included outside research
Superior

Student included 6 or more relevant sources and explained importance of sources in relation to topic; included outside research
Grammar

Poor

Writer makes more than 9 errors in syntax, S/V agreement, parallelism, active/passive, spelling, or organization that distract the reader.
Below average

Writer makes 7-8 errors in syntax, S/V agreement, parallelism, active/passive, spelling, or organization that distract the reader.
Average

Writer makes 5-6 errors in syntax, S/V agreement, parallelism, active/passive, spelling, or organization that distract the reader.
Above average

Writer makes 2-4 errors in syntax, S/V agreement, parallelism, active/passive, spelling, or organization that distract the reader.
Superior

Writer makes almost no errors in syntax, S/V agreement, parallelism, active/passive, spelling, or organization that distract the reader.
Format

Poor

Student did not follow format, including no works cited and not meeting page requirement
Below average

Student followed format minimally; no works cited page
Average

Student followed format some of the time; works cited page included but not in proper format
Above average

Student followed format with one or two mistakes
Superior

Student followed format, no mistakes; works cited in proper format



Keywords:
  • Critique, Article, College Essay



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16