Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Character Analysis Essay Peer Evaluation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Character Analysis Essay Peer Evaluation
Character Analysis Essay Peer Evaluation
Work with the students in your seating pod to read and provide feedback on each other’s paper. First, read the essay completely without stopping. Then, use the peer evaluation rubric below to provide feedback. You will turn in your peer review when you turn in your final paper. Identify what's missing, what needs to be explained more fully, and what can be cut. Be honest, but polite and constructive, in your response. The review is the rubric I will use to grade the essay.
Rubric Code:
JXB3W25
By
kmkeys
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Character Analysis Essay
Excellent
10 pts
Good
8 pts
Fair
6 pts
Poor
4 pts
Thesis Statement
Excellent
Clear and strong thesis statement. The thesis statement previews the three main points which will be analyzed in the essay. The thesis statement makes an assertion about how these qualities led to the demise of the character --or--how these qualities were used to complicate the action of the play.
Good
Thesis statement is clear but could be a little stronger. The thesis statment previews three of the main points which will be analyzed in the essay.
Fair
Thesis statement is somewhat unclear and is stated as a fact. Thesis statement only mentions two of the character's qualities that will be analyzed in the essay.
Poor
Thesis statement is very unclear. Only mentions one qualitiy of the character that is going to be analyzed, or does not mention one at all.
Evidence
Excellent
Students includes at least three strong pieces of evidence (at least one for each character quality) from the text, including direct quotes, as well as outside sources, to support the assertion.
Good
Student uses three pieces of evidence (at least one for each character quality) from the text to support the assertion, as well as outside sources. Evidence could be a little stronger.
Fair
Student only uses two pieces of evidence from the text to support the assertion. May only include one or two direct quotes, or unreliable outside sources, and these may be somewhat unrelated to the assertion.
Poor
Student only includes one piece of evidence to support the assertion. No direct quotes from the text or reliable outside sources. Evidence does not clearly support the assertion.
Commentary
Excellent
Student writes rich and descriptive commentary that explains directly how the evidence supports the conclusion. Student may give examples that further illustrate or explain the evidence.
Good
Student writes commentary that directly explains how the evidence supports the conclusion. Student may give one example that further illustrates or explains the evidence.
Fair
Student's commentary is often unrelated to evidence given, or does not clearly explain how the evidence supports the assertion directly.
Poor
Student has very no commentary, or commentary that is writtten is unrelated to discussion of the evidence presented.
Conclusion
Excellent
Student restates his/her assertion in the conclusion. Provides strong summary of the key points of the essay. Ends with statement about character.
Good
Student restates his/her assertion in the conclusion. Provides vague summary of the key points of the essay. Ends with statement about the character.
Fair
Student partially restates assertion in the conclusion. Provides very brief summary of the key points of the essay. Makes an attempt at ending the essay with a statement about the character.
Poor
Student did not restate the assertion in the conclusion. Little summary of the key points of the essay. Does not endd with statement about the character analyzed.
Organization
Excellent
Student included an introduction (containing strong attention-getting material, the title and author, a brief summary of the work and the thesis statement), a body paragraph for each quality analyzed, and a conclusion. Student cites source of all direct quotations and reliable outside sources by creating in-text citations using MLA formatting guidelines .
Good
Student included an introduction (containing attention-getting material, the title and author, a brief summary of the work and the thesis statement), a body paragraph for each quality analyzed, and a conclusion. Student cites source of some quotations by creating in-text citations and outside sources using ML A formatting guidelines, but may have one formatting error.
Fair
Student is missing one or two paragraphs (introduction, body, conclusion). Errors in organization may make it difficult to read essay. An attempt to use in-text citations for direct quotations, as well as the inclusion of reliable sources have been made, but the citations and sources do not follow MLA format.
Poor
Student is missing several parts of the essay. May have written the essay as one long paragraph or as a list. Organization errors make the essay difficult to read. In-text citations have not been used to cite the source of direct quotations.
Keywords:
character analysis, English
Subjects:
English
Types:
Exam
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Exam rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.