- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Plants- Multi Media Projects rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Plants- Multi Media Projects Plant Cycles Rubric Code: JX99779 By Jmauro308 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Project Grade Levels: K-5

Plant Cycles
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Partner/Group Effort	Poor Worked well with partner to problem solve, divide work equally, share resources and responsibilities a small percentage of the time.	Fair Worked well with partner to problem solve, divide work equally, share resources and responsibilities over half of the time.	Good Worked well with partner to problem solve, divide work equally, share resources and responsibilities throughout the entire project.
Information/Content	Poor Most or all Information given was incorrect. Spelling mistake. Missing information or steps.	Fair Most Information provided was correct, but a few content mistakes in the area of spelling, missing steps or content.	Good All Information given was correct. All spelling was correct.
Resources	Poor Used no resources	Fair All information came from the same resource. example 1 science book, one video, one science library book or 1 student science journal ONLY)	Good Used an array of resources. example: you used more than one of the following items to create your project: science book, one video, one science library book or a student science journal.
Visual Display	Poor Words and images are sloppy and without color. Used limited 2D and 3D materials.	Fair Words and images are fairly neat with and a little color was added. Used some 2D and 3D materials.	Good Words and images are neat and colorful. Work clean and neat! Creative use of a variety of 2D and 3D materials.
Verbal Prestentation	Poor Student's voice was not clear and student did not maintain eye contact with class during the presentation. Student was not able to explain the content or answer questions about it.	Fair Student's voice was clear and student maintained eye contact with class during part of presentation. Student was able to explain the content, but not answer questions about it.	Good Student's voice was clear and student maintained eye contact with class during the whole presentation. Student was able to explain the content and answer questions about it.