Skip to main content

iRubric: Case Study Summary1 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Case Study Summary1

Biology Physiology Summative Assessment Essays

Rubric Code: J756WW

By jhutchison

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Science

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Case Study Summary
	Poor 5 pts	Moderate 10 pts	Good 15 pts	Excellent 20 pts
Mechanics Overall	Poor Answer is not organized. More than five grammatical errors. Essay is messy and difficult to read.	Moderate Answer is organized and legible. There are no more than three grammatical errors.	Good Answer is organized. There are no more than two grammatical errors.	Excellent Answer is carefully thought out and well organized. There is not more than one grammatical mistake.
Define the disease	Poor The definition either does not address the topics stated in the question or addresses them, but incorrectly.	Moderate Some topics stated in the question are addressed correctly. The answer gives some details that are correct.	Good Most of the topics stated in the question are addressed correctly. The answer includes many details that add to the depth of the answer.	Excellent The answer includes every detail that creates a complete and thorough answer to the question. Explicitly writes out the definition of hyperparathyroidism.
explain pathology/etiology	Poor The explanation either does not address the topics stated in the question or addresses them, but incorrectly.	Moderate Some topics stated in the question are addressed correctly. The answer gives some details that are correct.	Good Most of the topics stated in the question are addressed correctly. The answer includes many details that add to the depth of the answer.	Excellent The answer includes every detail that creates a complete and thorough answer to the question. Reveals that 90% of HP is caused by tumor. Importance of calcium
explain symptoms	Poor The explanation either does not address the topics stated in the question or addresses them, but incorrectly.	Moderate Some topics stated in the question are addressed correctly. The answer gives some details that are correct.	Good Most of the topics stated in the question are addressed correctly. The answer includes many details that add to the depth of the answer.	Excellent The answer includes every detail that creates a complete and thorough answer to the question. Does not just list symptoms
explain tests/ imaging	Poor The explanation either does not address the topics stated in the question or addresses them, but incorrectly.	Moderate Some topics stated in the question are addressed correctly. The answer gives some details that are correct.	Good Most of the topics stated in the question are addressed correctly. The answer includes many details that add to the depth of the answer.	Excellent The answer includes every detail that creates a complete and thorough answer to the question. CT, sestamibi, and all other tests run
interpret test results	Poor The interpretation either does not address the topics stated in the question or addresses them, but incorrectly.	Moderate Some topics stated in the question are addressed correctly. The answer gives some details that are correct.	Good Most of the topics stated in the question are addressed correctly. The answer includes many details that add to the depth of the answer.	Excellent The answer includes every detail that creates a complete and thorough answer to the question. why each test result gives reasoning to symptoms
give possible treatments for Pete	Poor The explanation either does not address the topics stated in the question or addresses them, but incorrectly.	Moderate Some topics stated in the question are addressed correctly. The answer gives some details that are correct.	Good Most of the topics stated in the question are addressed correctly. The answer includes many details that add to the depth of the answer.	Excellent The answer includes every detail that creates a complete and thorough answer to the question. Treatment options given
explain treatment pros/ cons	Poor The explanation either does not address the topics stated in the question or addresses them, but incorrectly.	Moderate Some topics stated in the question are addressed correctly. The answer gives some details that are correct.	Good Most of the topics stated in the question are addressed correctly. The answer includes many details that add to the depth of the answer.	Excellent The answer includes every detail that creates a complete and thorough answer to the question. give pro/con for eat treatment type
credible sources	Poor No sources given	Moderate non-credible sources given in bibliography	Good credible sources given in bibliography	Excellent credibile sources given and properly cited throughout the paper in text (author, date)

Keywords:

essay

Subjects:

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Biology rubrics

More Writing rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n58