iRubric: Criteria for Interviewing Skills rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Criteria for Interviewing Skills

This rubric will help to assess how good my client interviewing skills are.

Rubric Code: J6347A

By LisaBG

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Communication

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Criteria for Interviewing Skills Enter rubric description
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Language was familiar Jargon was not used when these questions were asked	Poor Massage therapist used jargon without explanation.	Fair Jargon was defined, but content had language that was unfamiliar to informants.	Good Specialized vocabulary, jargon, and other references to subject of interview were explained.
Questions were clear The questions given clearly communicated what the researcher wanted to know.	Poor Questions were broad and confusing to the informant. Some were irrelevant.	Fair Questions explained with familiar language but didn't completely communicate what the researcher wanted.	Good Complex questions were not used so that the informant felt comfortable enough to share their experiences.
Open Ended Questions Were the questions used for the interview open ended?	Poor Questions could be answered with a "yes" or "no".	Fair Most but not all questions were answered with "yes" or "no"	Good Questions led to a thorough discussion without "yes" or "no" answers.
Interviewer is neutral Interviewer did not take sides in the interview, but remained neutral	Poor Leading questions were given constantly.	Fair Some questions were leading and some responses of the interviewee were received as leading.	Good The interviewer remained neutral, informative, and conducted a relevant interview.
Social skills	Poor Interviewer rushed through the interview, speech was difficult to understand/hear. Did not pay attention or appear connected to interviewee.	Fair Interviewer paid some attention to the interviewee, speech was sometimes difficult to understand/hear. Connection to interviewee vacillated.	Good Interviewer was polite and did not speak too fast or too slowly. Interviewer was attentive to the answers and questions of the interviewee. Was very present and connected.