Skip to main content

iRubric: Instrumental Music Group Performance rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Instrumental Music Group Performance 
End of Semester Group Performance Jury.
Rubric Code: J2W66WW
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Music  
Type: Exam  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Musical Performance
Group Jury
  Exceeding

4 pts

Meeting

3 pts

Approaching

2 pts

Emerging

1 pts

1. Rhythm/Tempo

Exceeding

accuracy of note values, duration, pulse,
steadiness, meter, etc.
is consistently demonstrated. Tempo is appropriate to the style of the piece with smooth transitions.
Meeting

accuracy of note values, duration, pulse,
steadiness, meter, etc.
is mostly demonstrated. Minor errors do not detract from the overall performance. Group is able to quickly recover.
Approaching

accuracy of note values, duration, pulse,
steadiness, meter, etc.
is sometimes demonstrated. Errors detract from the overall performance.
Emerging

accuracy of note values, duration, pulse,
steadiness, meter, etc is rarely demonstrated. Major breakdown in phasing causing the group to stop. Significant errors detract from the overall performance.
2. Note Accuracy

Exceeding

accuracy of printed pitches and intonation
within the appropriate range is consistently demonstrated. Students use advanced fingerings (higher positions/extended range) when notated.
Meeting

accuracy of printed pitches and intonation
within the appropriate range is mostly demonstrated. Any minor errors made are quickly adjusted and do not detract from the performance.
Approaching

accuracy of printed pitches and intonation
within the appropriate range is sometimes demonstrated. Errors are significant and detract from the performance.
Emerging

Major errors in accuracy of printed pitches and intonation throughout the group with little to no adjustments made. Performance is severely compromised due to errors.
3. Tone Quality

Exceeding

resonance, control, clarity,
focus, consistency, warmth, and support is consistently demonstrated by all members. Group plays with maturity, and an awareness of blend and balance.

Strings:
Excellent bow technique (placement, speed, weight, angle)
Meeting

resonance, control, clarity,
focus, consistency, warmth, breathing and support is mostly demonstrated. Tone is mostly balanced. Any minor errors made are quickly adjusted and do not detract from the performance.

Strings:
Group demonstrates proper bow technique
Approaching

resonance, control, clarity,
focus, warmth and support is sometimes demonstrated. Tone, blend and balance is developing.

Strings:
Bow technique is inconsistent but developing.
Emerging

resonance, control, clarity,
focus, consistency, warmth, breathing and support is rarely demonstrated. Tone is weak and unsupported. Group is imbalanced.

Strings:
Improper bow technique (placement, speed, weight, angle)
4. Articulation

Exceeding

accuracy and
style of attacks and releases is consistently demonstrated. Group matches in articulations.

Strings:
Slurs, bow placement and bow direction consistently reflect what is notated
Meeting

accuracy and
style of attacks and releases is mostly demonstrated. Group mostly matches articulation as notated. Errors do not detract from overall performance.

Strings:
Slurs, bow placement and bow direction reflect what is notated.
Approaching

accuracy and
style of attacks and releases is sometimes demonstrated. Group lacks uniformity in articulation. Significant errors detract from overall performance
Emerging

accuracy and
style of attacks and releases is rarely demonstrated. Major errors throughout the performance with little to no attention to articulation.
5. Musicianship/Stage Presence

Exceeding

Expressive elements, phrasing, dynamics, and stylistic interpretation
is consistently demonstrated. The group communicates effectively throughout the performance and demonstrates appropriate performance etiquette. (stage presence, posture)
Meeting

Expressive elements, phrasing, dynamics, and stylistic interpretation is mostly demonstrated. Occasional breakdown in communication (cohesiveness) but members are able to make quick adjustments. Group demonstrates appropriate performance etiquette. (stage presence, posture)
Approaching

Expressive elements, phrasing, dynamics, and stylistic interpretation is sometimes demonstrated. Significant breakdown in communication (cohesiveness) detracting from overall performance.
Performance etiquette is not consistent.
Emerging

Expressive elements, phrasing, dynamics, and stylistic interpretation is rarely demonstrated. Group does not communicate, lacks cohesiveness and does not demonstrate appropriate performance etiquette. (stage presence, posture)




Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n112