iRubric: Movie Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Movie Project

Students will work together in assigned teams to create a video project that details a specific aspect of the course. The presentation should include appropriate photographs, video, music, graphs, and other visual aids.

Rubric Code: HX9B492

By alambag25

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Movie Project
	Excellent - 5 (N/A)	Good - 4 (N/A)	Fair - 3 (N/A)	Poor - 2 (N/A)	Not Complete - 1 (N/A)
Plot	Excellent - 5 Script has an indepth, complete, logical story with a beginning, middle and end.	Good - 4 Script is complete, logical story with a beginning, middle and end.	Fair - 3 Script is complete with a few rough spots; needs more length.	Poor - 2 Script is incomplete with major gaps; length is too short	Not Complete - 1 No script was turned in.
Audio	Excellent - 5 Relevance Audio is relevant to Movie. Adds interest and encourages comprehension Microphones are positioned optimally to ensure that important sounds and dialogue are captured. The team has made every attempt to anticipate and filter out unwanted ambient noise in the recording. Music stirs a rich emotional response that matches the story line well.	Good - 4 Some audio is relevant, but some is just for fun Microphones are positioned optimally to ensure that important sounds and dialogue are captured. Music stirs a rich emotional response that somewhat matches the story line.	Fair - 3 Audio distracts viewer from intent of Movie; Volume too loud or too soft At least one microphone (in addition to that on the camera) is used to ensure that dialogue is captured. Music is okay, and not distracting, but it does not add much to the story.	Poor - 2 Audio is not of good quality; scratchy, unclear Little attention was paid to ensuring quality sound during the shoot. Music is distracting, inappropriate, OR was not used.	Not Complete - 1 No audio is used inappropriate audio used No attention was paid to ensuring quality sound during the shoot. Music is distracting, inappropriate, OR was not used.
Pronunciation/Dialogue	Excellent - 5 Group is fluent, pronounces all words correctly. Uses complex ideas, native-like flow of speech.	Good - 4 In the group almost all words were pronounced correctly with the exception of 1-2 words. Uses more complex language, but with pauses or chunks.	Fair - 3 In the group some words were pronounced correctly with the exception of 3-4 words. Uses simple sentences.	Poor - 2 In the group many words were pronounced incorrectly. 5-6 words were pronounced incorrectly. Language is choppy and disconnected.	Not Complete - 1 7 + words were pronounced incorrectly
Acting & Originality	Excellent - 5 Great clarity, voice projection, no laughing that obscures scene, speaking in complete sentences.	Good - 4 Missing one of the previous elements	Fair - 3 Missing two of the previous elements	Poor - 2 Missing more than 2 elements or you can't understand or hear.	Not Complete - 1 Missing all elements.
Use of Technology	Excellent - 5 Excellent editing. Different scenes in film flow together naturally. The overall product is very convincing and well thought out.	Good - 4 Good editing. There is good flow between scenes. The end result is well adapted and convincing.	Fair - 3 Adequate editing. Some aspects of film do not flow together well. The end result is convincing but more direction and fluidity is needed.	Poor - 2 Poorly edited. Film does not flow/not convincing. Parts are hard to understand or lack structure or direction. Not well thought out.	Not Complete - 1 No editing. No movie.
Teamwork	Excellent - 5 All members contributed an equal significant role to the film/presentation.	Good - 4 All members contributed to the project, but some members did not play as significant a role in the production as a whole.	Fair - 3 All members al least contributed something. Some members are far less prominent in the production and video than others.	Poor - 2 Not all members contributed to the project. or one or more of the project members contributed almost nothing to the production.	Not Complete - 1 No members contributed to the project.
Overall Content	Excellent - 5 Strong message. Covers topic completely and in depth. Includes complete information.	Good - 4 Message is clearly communicated. Includes essential information.	Fair - 3 Message is vaguely communicated. Includes some essential information with few facts.	Poor - 2 Message is unclear. Includes little essential information and one or two facts.	Not Complete - 1 Message is unclear. Includes little essential information and one or two facts.
Technical: Digital Enhancements or	Excellent - 5 Digital enhancements are planned and purposeful, adding impact to the story line or focus.	Good - 4 Any digital enhancements that are used combine smoothly and effectively with the video.	Fair - 3 Digital enhancements accompany video, but there is little sign of reinforcement. Some tendency toward randomness with effects.	Poor - 2 Little enhancements add interest to the video, or excessive use of random enhancements detracts from the video.	Not Complete - 1 No enhancements add interest to the video, or excessive use of random enhancements detracts from the video.
Timeliness	Excellent - 5 All project deadlines were met. The duration of the movie is according to the allotted time: maximum of 1 hour and a minimum of 20 minutes.	Good - 4 Most project deadlines were met. Those that were late did not have significant impact on the finished project. The duration of the movie is 1 hour and 5 minutes and 19 minutes	Fair - 3 Many project deadlines were not met, resulting in some impact on the finished project. The duration of the movie is 1 hour and 10 minutes and 15 minutes	Poor - 2 Deadlines were regularly missed, having a significant impact on the final project. The duration of the movie is more than 1 hour and 15 minutes.	Not Complete - 1 Deadlines were regularly missed, having a significant impact on the final project.

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric