Skip to main content

iRubric: APA College Research Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
APA College Research Paper 
Research the topic of your choice using primary and secondary sources to report on an area of criminal justice that you want to know more about. Submit one 25-30 page typed paper, double spaced, 12 point font following APA 6th guidelines. Include a bibliography and abstract citing at least 7 resources used researching the paper. Paper will be graded on quality of research to support the topic, effective use of information gained through research, credibility of sources, content, grammar and mechanics, and bibliography.
Rubric Code: HB696W
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Research Paper
  Excellent

1 pts

Good

2 pts

Needs Improvement

3 pts

Unsatisfactory

4 pts

Content
40 %

Excellent

--Topic is of appropriate breadth for length of paper & an appropriate topic for research.
--Contains clear and concise abstract, subtitles, and resources page.
--Support for thesis complex, complete, & in-depth.
--5 or more in text citations are used to support the thesis.
--Writer involved with subject, not merely doing an assignment.
--Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
--Paper submitted to SmartThinking
Good

--Topic mostly of appropriate breadth for length of paper & an appropriate topic for research.
--Contains somewhat clear and concise abstract, subtitles, and resources page.
--Support for thesis sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity.
-- Less then 5 in text citations are used to support the thesis.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Needs Improvement

--Topic of semi- appropriate breadth for length of paper & a topic is partially clear.
-- Only 2-3 in text citations used to support thesis.
--Missing abstract, but includes subtitles, and resources page.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Unsatisfactory

--Topic unclear and of inappropriate breadth for length of paper.
--Missing abstract, subtitles, and resources page.
--Support for thesis insufficient.
--No organization, transitions, introduction, and no conclusion.
Quality of research
30 %

Excellent

--Cited 7 or more sources.
--Sources reliable and properly cited.
--All information included.
--Sufficient information provided to support all elements of topic.
--Research in-depth and beyond the obvious, revealing new insights gained.
Good

--Cited 5 sources.
--Sources mostly reliable.
-- Citation errors minor.
--Most information included.
--Sufficient information provided.
--Research of sufficent depth.
Needs Improvement

-- Cited 3-5 sources.
--Source reliablility questionable.
-Information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source.
--Some information relevant to thesis.
--Information provided to support some elements of topic.
--Surface research.
Unsatisfactory

--Failed to cite even 3 sources
--Sources unreliable.
--Information interferes with ability of reader to understand paper.
--Irrelevant to thesis.
--Information does not support the topic.
--Surface research.
Grammar and Mechanics
15 %

Excellent

--Consistent and appropriate voice.
-- Sophisticated and precise word choice.
--No spelling errors.
--No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedentsor tense.
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.
--Met all style and min/max page requirements.
Good

-- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate.
-- Fairly effective word choice.
--No more than 2 spelling errors.
--Fewer than 1 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedentsor tense.
-- Fewer than 2 punctuation or capitalization errors.
--Met most style and min/max page requirements.
Needs Improvement

-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.
-- Correct word choice.
--More than 3 spelling errors.
--More than 2 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedentsor tense.
-- More than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Attempted to meet style and/or min/max page requirements.
Unsatisfactory

-- Voice inconsistent and inappropriate.
-- Incorrect word choices.
--More than 5 spelling errors.
--More than 5 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedentsor tense.
-- More than 5 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Does not meet style and/or min/max page requirements.
Bibliography/Resources
15 %

Excellent

--All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- No errors in format or punctuation.
Good

--All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- Very few errors in format or punctuation.
Needs Improvement

--Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- Errors in format or punctuation do not compromise the ideas of the paper.
Unsatisfactory

--Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- Errors in format or punctuation make ideas unclear.



Keywords:
  • Research paper - emphasis on relevance of research







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n112