Skip to main content

iRubric: CGU4C- Cumulating Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
CGU4C- Cumulating Project 
Rubric Code: HA2673
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Geography  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Cumulating Project
  Excellent

25 pts

Great

15 pts

Good

10 pts

Acceptable

5 pts

Below Standards

0 pts

Project Appearance and Presentation

Excellent

Project is clear, well-organized, and follows the suggested formatted. Layout and appearance are clear and helpful. Fonts and formatting (MLA) are clean and guide the reader. Visuals (if used) are detailed, attractive, and printed in color. It looks professional.
Great

Project gets the author's points across but has some organizational issues and presentation issues. Citations may be incorrectly formatted. Print quality may be poor. Layout may be cluttered with photos and images not related in the assignment.
Good

Quality of project interferes with the information being presented. Print quality, formatting, and fonts hinder rather than help the presentation. Citations are missing essential information or are formatted inconsistently.
Acceptable

Project is poor. Fonts do not match. Format does not match the assignment. Labels are not present. Units are unclear. Visuals (if used) are of poor quality or missing. Print quality is poor. Loose papers are not stapled.
Below Standards

Project is badly printed. It is illegible or pages are missing.
Overall Project

Excellent

The overall project is a thoughtful, well-written, insightful essay that highlights the all of the most important elements of the Urban Geography. It reflects knowledge and judgment about the strengths, challenges, and uniqueness of the urban area.
Great

The overall project is accurate, but it shows a limited ability to make judgments about what concerns the urban area. It may contain grammar or organization errors. It misses some of the most obvious unique challenges or strengths of the urban area. It may be too brief.
Good

The overall project is mostly a re-listing of data already presented in the unit assignments or is poorly-written. It does not show the ability to make solid judgments about what matters most in your urban area. It may include statistics without analysis or context.
Acceptable

The overall project is incomprehensible or is grossly grammatically-incorrect that it convey little useful information.
Below Standards

The overall project is missing or is partly or completely plagiarized. Direct quotations appear without quotation marks or citations and paraphrases are used without citation.
Data and Content

Excellent

Virtually all of the required data is present, selected from valid resources, accurate, and the sources are clear. The text is not cut-and-paste. At least two 8 sources are referenced in MLA formatting.
Great

Some gaps in the data and/or some errors, but the overall trend is towards quality information and most of the data are presented. Sources are at times unclear. There is less than 8 but more than 4 sources referenced.
Good

Substantial gaps in the data and/or significant errors; the overall trend is towards rushed work and incomplete information. Much of the text may be cut-and-paste. Sources are often times unclear. There are less than 4 sources referenced.
Acceptable

Much of the data is missing, including whole sections. Errors are common. Sources are missing.
Below Standards

The majority of the data is missing.
Recommendation & Presentation

Excellent

Plan recommendation successfully address the most important information of the CP. It shows insight and knowledge of the project and requirements. It is grammatically-correct, well-organized and include clear topic sentences.
Great

The Plan's recommendation is basically sound, but demonstrates limited problems with grammar, missed essential information, or are too brief.
Good

The Plan's recommendation is obviously too brief, contains incorrect information, is grammatically-flawed, or miss vital information about the subject.
Acceptable

The Plan's recommendation is very brief or nonexistent, contains much incorrect information, is grammatically-flawed, and misses the most vital information about the urban area.
Below Standards

The summary is missing or are plagiarized.
Attendance

Excellent

Present every day of class while working diligently on the project.
Great

Missed one day of class or off task on several occasions.
Good

Missed two days of class or asked to get back on task on several occasions.
Acceptable

Missed 3 days of class or off task on several occasions and did not respond well to requests.
Below Standards

Miss 4 days of class or put forth very little effort in class to use the time to the best advantage




Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n58