iRubric: Scientist Voicethread rubric

Your slide contains the scientists name and a few important concepts from the research. You visually represent the content or scientist in some way. Your slide is visually appealing and has a nice balance of words and pictures. You mention where this research was done.

Your slide contains both words and pictures. You could be more careful in the words or pictures you use. You mention where the research was done.

Your slide either has too much detail or too little in other words there is not a balance between content and pictures to process while you are talking. You might have forgotten to include where the research was done at.

You created a slide but it is too vague. It is difficult to understand the research you read about or the person you wrote to. You forgot to mention where this research was done.

You commented on at least two of your peers' slides. Your comment shows a through understanding of the author's slide. Your comment either praises specific things you thought were well-done in the slide or comment or you offered advice for future Voicethread contributions.

Your comment shows that you read their slide and listened to their comment. Perhaps you could have found something more specific to comment about or offer improvement on.

You commented on at least two of your peers' slides. Your comments could have been more thoughtful or complete.

You commented on at least one of your peers' slides but your comments lacked depth, understanding, or analysis of the slide and comment.