- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Case Study Oral Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Case Study Oral Presentation Case Study Oral Presentation Oral presentation of case study Rubric Code: GXB8AW7 By sbenatti Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Public Administration Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Graduate

Case study presentation
	Poor 0 pts	Fair 1 pts	Good 2 pts	Excellent 3 pts	Points (N/A)
Presentation Communication	Poor The oral presentation was inarticulate and difficult to follow. Poor delivery and timing of information. Did not seem to know the material. Poor discussion of questions.	Fair The oral presentation was choppy, difficult to follow. Presenter did not have a grasp on the information. Frequent pauses for him or her to find their place. Too much reading. Needs more interaction and discussion of questions.	Good The oral presentation was mostly smooth and seamless, few verbal pauses. The presenter appeared calm, had a general grasp of information. Proficient delivery and timing of information. Proficient discussion initiated/ maintained	Excellent The oral presentation was smooth and seamless. The presenter appeared calm and in command of the information. Exceptional delivery. Exceptional discussion intiated and maintained to facilitate learning	Points
Content Application	Poor The PowerPoint slides were completely unrelated to the topic being discussed and/or were unintelligible. Weak conclusions. Presentation needs to be more logical and organized.	Fair The PowerPoint slides were difficult to understand and difficult to read. Student does not understand the case information. Unrealistic solutions.	Good The PowerPoint slides were somewhat organized. Student somewhat understands the dynamics, presented some realistic alternatives, objectives, some sound implementation strategies.	Excellent The PowerPoint slides were clear and understandable. Student understands the dynamics, presented realistic alternatives, objectives, sound implementation strategies.	Points
Completeness Thinking/Inquiry	Poor Lack of critical or analytical thought and little to no insight utilized.	Fair More details, insight, and critical thought needed.	Good Proficient critical analysis of issue and impact using many details and evidence. Moderate insight into issue.	Excellent Exceptional insight into critical components & analysis of issue.	Points