iRubric: Collaboration rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Collaboration

Group project teamwork evaluation. Students will evaluate one another using this rubric, and faculty will submit copies for overall objective assessment within the class.

Rubric Code: GX56337

By Girraween

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Project

Grade Levels: K-5, Undergraduate

Team Work
	Poor 4 pts	Fair 6 pts	Good 8 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Contributions	Poor Rarely provides useful ideas when participating in the group and in classroom discussion. May refuse to participate.	Fair Sometimes provides useful ideas when participating in the group and in classroom discussion. A satisfactory group member who does what is required.	Good Usually provides useful ideas when participating in the group and in classroom discussion. A strong group member who tries hard.	Excellent Routinely provides useful ideas when participating in the group and in classroom discussion. A definite leader who contributes a lot of effort.
Quality of Work	Poor Provides work that usually needs to be checked\redone by others to ensure quality.	Fair Provides work that occasionally needs to be checked\redone by other group members to ensure quality.	Good Provides high quality work.	Excellent Provides work of the highest quality.
Attitude	Poor Often is publicly critical of the project or the work of other members of the group. Rarely has a positive attitude about the task(s).	Fair Occasionally is publicly critical of the project or the work of other members of the group. Usually has a positive attitude about the task(s).	Good Rarely is publicly critical of the project or the work of others. Often has a positive attitude about the task(s).	Excellent Never is publicly critical of the project or the work of others. Always has a positive attitude about the task(s).
Working with Others	Poor Rarely listens to, shares with, and suports the efforts of others. Sometimes is not a good team member.	Fair Often listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others, and is often a good team member.	Good Usually listens to, shares, with, and supports the efforts of others. Does not cause "waves" in the group.	Excellent Almost always listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others. Tries to keep people working well together.
Monitors Group Effectiveness	Poor Rarely monitors the effectiveness of the group and does not work to make it more effective.	Fair Occasionally monitors the effectiveness of the group and works to make the group more effective.	Good Routinely monitors the effectiveness of the group and works to make the group more effective.	Excellent Routinely monitors the effectiveness of the group, and makes suggestions to make it more effective. Suggestions are taken up.
Final Product	Poor Final product shows little connection to task objectives.	Fair Final product shows some awareness of the task objectives.	Good Final product shows a sound awareness of the task objectives. Product could be useful and effective in helping the environment.	Excellent Final product shows a thorough awareness of the task objectives. Product would be useful and effective in helping the environment.
Knowledge	Poor Member has limited knowledge of the process, product and purpose of the product. Limited ability to answer questions.	Fair Member has some knowledge of the process, product and purpose of the product. This is shared when prompted.	Good Member can share with an audience, a sound knowledge of the process, product and purpose of the product. Some questions are answered in a basic way.	Excellent Member can share with an engaged audience, a thorough knowledge of the process, product and purpose of the product. There is interaction with the audience. Questions are answered clearly.

Keywords:

Stage 2 upcycling

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric