iRubric: Comparative Analysis rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Comparative Analysis

Glogster Rubric

Comparative Analysis Glogster Rubric

Rubric Code: GAXWB3

By mkenneylms

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Comparative Analysis
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Intro/Conc 25 %
Introduction	Excellent Sets the tone for the Glog and excellently generates interest for the topics	Good Sets the tone for the Glog and adequately generates interest for the topics.	Fair Attempts to set the tone for the Glog and generate interest for the topics.	Poor Does not set the tone for the Glog or generate interest for the topics.
Thesis	Excellent Very well developed Thesis. It clearly states the topics being analyzed.	Good The thesis is fairly well developed. But it is not very engaging or creative, but it does introduce the topics being analyzed.	Fair The thesis states the topics being analyzed, but it does not give a reason for the analysis.	Poor The thesis does not state what is being analyzed, and there is no apparent basis for the analysis indicated.
Conclusion	Excellent Provides an excellent general summary about the topics while drawing a larger conclusion about those topics based on the research.	Good Provides an adequate general summary about the topics while drawing a larger conclusion about those topics based on the research.	Fair Attempts to provides a general summary about the topics but does not draw a larger conclusion about those topics based on the research.	Poor Does not provides a general summary about the topics or draw a larger conclusion about those topics based on the research.
Content 35 %
Comparison	Excellent Details about the comparison are concrete and specific, and are effectively related to the topics of analysis. There are enough details to clearly analysis the topic.	Good Details about the comparison are concrete and specific, but they are not engaging and interesting. There are sufficient details for the analysis, but they could be clearer.	Fair There are details about the comparison, but they are either not concrete and specific, or there are not enough of them to adequately analyze the topic.	Poor Details about the comparison are either wrong or lacking, or they are not related to the topic sentence or the analysis.
Contrast	Excellent Details about the contrast are concrete and specific, and are effectively related to the topics of analysis. There are enough details to clearly analysis the topic.	Good Details about the contrast are concrete and specific, but they are not engaging and interesting. There are sufficient details for the analysis, but they could be clearer.	Fair There are details about the contrast, but they are either not concrete and specific, or there are not enough of them to adequately analyze the topic.	Poor Details about the contrast are either wrong or lacking, or they are not related to the topic sentence or the analysis.
Aesthetics 30 %
Design	Excellent The Glog is exceptionally attractive in terms of design, layout, and neatness.	Good The Glog is attractive in terms of design, layout, and neatness.	Fair The Glog is fairly attractive, but a bit messy	Poor The Glog is poorly designed and very messy.
Graphics	Excellent All graphics & videos are related to the topic and make the Glog easier to read and understand.	Good Almost all the graphics & videos are related to the topic and most make it easier to read and understand	Fair Some of the graphics & videos are related to the topic and make it easier to understand.	Poor Few of the graphics & videos are related to the topic.
Other 10 %
Grammar/mechanics	Excellent No grammatical or mechanical errors present.	Good One to three grammatical or mechanical errors present.	Fair Three to five grammatical or mechanical errors present.	Poor More than five grammatical or mechanical errors present.
Citations	Excellent Two or more informational sources listed and external multimedia cited in proper MLA format.	Good One informational source listed in proper MLA format.	Fair Two or more sources listed in improper format	Poor One source listed in improper format

Keywords:

Glog, Web2.0, poster, multimedia

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric