iRubric: Social Issues Podcast rubric

-Content was numerous with many different kinds of examples.
-Research was advanced and cited many sources.
-The event/issue is current and relevant to contemporary times.
Facts are shared about the issue.
-The who, what, where, and why questions are addressed.
-Group has adequately research the topic.
-Student has included at least four facts regarding the topic

-Content was well organized and relevant. research was well done and cited correctly.
-Facts are shared about the issue.
-Key information is shared. Some info might be lacking.
-Some information might be assumed by class.
-Information was incorrect or incomplete
-Student has included at least three facts regarding the topic

-Content was adequate and research was sufficient for the task
-Only a few facts are shared with class. --Presentation is giving information based on opinions/assumptions. Who, what, where is not present.
-Lacking key historical connection that could help class understand better.
-Information was incorrect or incomplete
-Student has included at least two facts regarding the topic

-Content was basic and did not go beyond personal beliefs.
Research was not cited, incomplete, or biased.
-It is evident that presentation is inadequately researched. Major lack of factual information.
-All key information is incorrect,
-Student has included less than two facts regarding the topic

-Group shares different political/social points of view regarding the issue.
-Both sides of the debate are addressed and group identifies each point of view.
-Make sure both sides are described and classmates can understand the rationale of both arguments.

-Both sides of debate are accurately addressed, but not accurately or lacking detail.
-Key information of one viewpoint is lacking.
-Students only focused on one opinion /view.

-Only one side of debate are accurately addressed, but not accurately or lacking detail.
-Key information of one viewpoint is severely lacking.
-Students only focused on one opinion /view.

-Students did not identify different bias or point of view regarding the issue/event.
-Zero effort was made to address the rationale of both arguments

There is:
-an introduction that sets up the podcast
-clear ending
-evident that you took time to prepare (example: no giggling, no dead space, no rushing)

A ppt, prezi, or some other type of visual tool is used to help students learn. Tool is well organized, students are informed of topic and use tool and a addition and not direct reading from screen. Presentation has pictures, bullet points, chart, maps etc... No just paragraph format

There is 2 out of 3:
-an introduction that sets up the podcast
-clear ending
-evident that you took time to prepare (example: no giggling, no dead space, no rushing)

There is 1 out of 3
-an introduction that sets up the podcast
-clear ending
-evident that you took time to prepare (example: no giggling, no dead space, no rushing)

There podcast is not up to par

--Student demonstrates full knowledge with explanations and elaboration.
-Student is able to answer in detail any questions from the class

-Student demonstrates full knowledge with explanations and elaboration.
-Students are unable to fully answer questions from the class

-Students were not prepared to encourage discussion.
Student is at ease with content, but fails to elaborate.

Speaker did not enhance or advance the debate, was unprepared, or comments were inappropriate.
-Student is uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions.