- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Valuation Magazine Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Valuation Magazine Project Magazine Project Rubric Code: G223W99 By ermax825 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Project Grade Levels: Graduate

Valuation Magazine Project
	Great 10 pts	Good 8 pts	Fair 6 pts	Poor 3 pts
Magazine Title and Cover Page 10 pts 10%	Great Choose a title that can reflect the audience you are trying to reach. The photo is compelling and brings the reader into the magazine.	Good The title does not reflect the targeted audience. It is still creative. The photo does not bring the reader to the cover.	Fair Does not follow expectations. Is not creative. The photo detracts from the magazine.	Poor The title does not meet any of the criteria. The photo is missing.
Graphics/Color/Design 10 pts 15%	Great Colors/graphics are used to add interest to the cover. Color is used to effectively bring in reader.	Good Colors/graphics used does not bring in the viewer. The use of colors/graphics are ineffective.	Fair Color/graphic used is plain. It shows no research.	Poor Colors or graphics are used ineffectively.
Timeliness 10 pts 10%	Great The soft copy of the magazine was submitted before the due date.	Good The soft copy of the magazine project was submitted by the due date.	Fair The soft copy of the magazine project was submitted within 5 days beyond the due date.	Poor The soft copy of the magazine project was submitted 5 days beyond the due date.
Required Information 45 pts 45%	Great The required information is complete and beyond exceeded the instructor's expectation. It is interesting and has no corrections.	Good The required information is interesting but has some corrections.	Fair The required information is okay but needs to be corrected.	Poor The required information is not interesting and has many corrections.
Summary, Conclusion, and Forecast 20 pts 20%	Great provided excellent summary, conclusion, and forecast. Summary, conclusion, and forecast were fully anchored from the analysis and valuation methods.	Good provided good summary, conclusion, and forecast. Summary, conclusion, and forecast were fully anchored from the analysis and valuation methods.	Fair provided good summary, conclusion, and forecast. Summary, conclusion, and forecast were somewhat anchored from the analysis and valuation methods.	Poor provided not enough summary, conclusion, and forecast. Not connected to the analysis and valuation methods presented.