iRubric: Multimedia Video rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Multimedia Video

This rubric is used for a short video production

Rubric Code: FXW69AC

By Pmctier

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Business

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Video Rubric
	Failure (0-11) 0 pts	Poor (12-13) 13 pts	Average (14-16) 15 pts	Good (17-18) 17 pts	Excellent (19-20) 20 pts
Content	Failure Failed to meet standards, but attempted.	Poor The content presented does not have enough information for its intended audience.	Average The content presented has some of the information necessary or is presented in a way that is confusing.	Good The content presented is complete and informative. It is presented in a standard way with some inefficiency.	Excellent The content presented is complete and informative. It is presented in ways that are interesting and an efficient.
Titles	Failure Failed to meet standards, but attempted.	Poor Graphics do not go well with the accompanying text or appear to be randomly chosen.	Average Graphics go well with the text, but there are too few and the publication of the text seems to be heavy.	Good Graphics go well with the text, but there are so many that they distract from the title.	Excellent Graphics go well with the text and there is a good mix of text and graphics.
Transitions/Special Effects	Failure Failed to meet standards, but attempted. Do not compliment the video.	Poor Compliment the video but are of poor quality.	Average Compliment the video and are of average quality.	Good Compliment the video and are of good quality.	Excellent Compliment the video and are of excellent quality.
Length	Failure Failed to meet the required length by 6 seconds or more.	Poor The publication’s missed the required length by 4-5 seconds.	Average The publication missed the required length by 2-3 seconds.	Good The publication missed the required length by 1 second.	Excellent The publication met the required length exactly!
Audio/Music	Failure Failed to meet standards, but attempted.	Poor The audio somewhat complemented the video, somewhat overwhelmed the video with incorrect volume levels, but was tolerable to listen to.	Average The audio somewhat complemented the video, and somewhat overwhelmed the video with incorrect volume levels.	Good The audio complemented the video but overwhelmed the video with incorrect volume levels.	Excellent The audio complemented the video and did not overwhelm the video with incorrect volume levels.