Skip to main content
iRubric: Multicultural Education rubric

iRubric: Multicultural Education rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Multicultural Education 
Persuasive Paper
Write a 3-5 page paper discussing at least two cultural biases/stereotypes that affect interactions in the classroom and/or clinical settings. Identify a self-assessment tool instructors and their students can use to evaluate their knowledge and discuss why you chose the method. Discuss methods that can be used in the classroom and/or clinical settings to improve these interactions. Provide a minimum of 5 scholarly articles to support you findings, use APA format to cite references.
Rubric Code: FX4X43X
By ldixon113
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Excellent

Exceeded expectations of the criterion

20 pts

Good

Met expectations of the criterion

17 pts

Fair

Met most of the expectations of the criterion

15 pts

Poor

Did not meet expectations of the criterion

13 pts

Identify 3 Cultural Biases

Discuss at least three cultural biases/stereotypes that affect interactions in the classroom and/or clinical settings between instructors and students, and students and their peers.
Excellent

Identified three or more cultural biases/stereotypes. Clearly discussed their affect on interactions in the classroom and/or clinical settings between instructors and students, and students and their peers. Included appropriate examples and findings well supported.
Good

Identified three cultural biases/stereotypes. Somewhat discussed their affect on interactions in the classroom and/or clinical settings between instructors and students, and students and their peers. Findings somewhat supported.
Fair

Identified three biases/stereotypes. Generally discussed their affect on interactions in the classroom and/or clinical settings between instructors and students, and students and their peers, lacked detailed information. Findings are not well supported.
Poor

Identified less than three cultural biases/stereotypes. Did not appropriately discuss their affect on interactions in the classroom and/or clinical settings between instructors and students, and students and their peers, no detailed information. Findings are not supported.
Self Assessment Tool

Identify one self-assessment tool instructors can use to assist them and their students in evaluating their knowledge of cultural competence and discuss why you chose the method.
Excellent

Self assessment tool clearly identified. Reasons for selecting the tool are clearly addressed and are well supported with excellent details. Content is consistent and clear.
Good

Self assessment tool identified. Reasons for selecting the tool are addressed and somewhat supported with details. Content is somewhat consistent and clear.
Fair

Self assessment tool identified. Reasons for selecting the tool are generally addressed, but not well supported. Content is not always consistent and clear.
Poor

Self assessment tool is not clearly identified. Reasons for selecting the tool are not clear and are not supported. Content is inconsistent and unclear.
Evidence Based Methods

Discuss at least two evidence based methods that can be used in the classroom and/or clinical settings to improve these interactions.
Excellent

Clearly discussed at two or more evidence based methods that can be used in the classroom and/or clinical settings to improve these interactions. Findings well supported with excellent details. Content is consistent and clear.
Good

Discussed at least two evidence based methods that can be used in the classroom and/or clinical settings to improve these interactions. Findings are somewhat supported with good details. Content is somewhat consistent and clear.
Fair

Generally discussed at least two evidence based methods that can be used in the classroom and/or clinical settings to improve these interactions. Findings are not well supported. Content is not always consistent and clear.
Poor

Discussed less than two evidence based methods that can be used in the classroom and/or clinical settings to improve these interactions. Findings are not clear and are not supported. Content is inconsistent and unclear
Grammar

Excellent

Follows rules of grammar, paper is exceptionally easy to read.
Good

Makes 1-2 errors in grammar that distract the reader from the content, but paper is still easy to read.
Fair

Makes greater than 3-4 errors in grammar that distract the reader from the content and make the paper more difficult to read.
Poor

Makes 4 or more errors in grammar that distract the reader from the content and interrupt the flow of the paper.
References

Provide a minimum of 5 scholarly articles to support you findings, use APA format to cite references.
Excellent

Five scholarly articles are correctly cited according to APA guidelines.
Good

Five scholarly articles are used but all articles are not correctly cited according to APA guidelines.
Fair

Less than five scholarly articles are used but are correctly cited according to APA guidelines.
Poor

Less than five scholarly articles are used and are incorrectly cited according to APA guidelines



Keywords:
  • Written paper



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16